Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : NORE - High Tech Bingo Equipment - Online Bingo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ArtieM who wrote (519)	1/20/1998 9:20:00 AM
From: Silicon Trader	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7701

EZ, just got back from another lap around my fluffy little town. I have been thinking about the conversation that we all had yesterday on this thread. I disagree on several issues, but All in all , we do agree that a in house PR effort,is the best option. AS i was working this morning i was reflecting on my business and its roots, and it was developed from a in house effort , simliar to yours im sure. LBI, is made up of some guys that , i feel want to help , but might be lacking in areas, to include not doing what they say. One thing i will say is that i know they are not out to hurt the company.Other firms in the past i might question that issue. I want to make a proposal or get some feedback. 1) Are there any shareholders willing to dedicate 3-5 hours a week , on their own time , to help execute an awarness program. 2) If so , lets form a plan. The more people talking ,the more people we can all reach ,and take an interactive approach to our investment. No hype , i think we have research available such as the Web site and Daves FAQ. The biggest problem with in house PR , is the lack of Investment industry contacts. How can way approach this, if we decide to continue with this idea. GO NRAG MBA