Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJB who wrote (1127931)	3/31/2019 10:34:40 AM
From: bruwin	1 Recommendation Recommended By Mick Mørmøny Respond to of 1576909

Yes, .... If she stood up in Parliament, on the 12th April, and said that she had tried her best to arrange a Deal with the EU that was acceptable to the United Kingdom, but unfortunately it was rejected by ALL WITHIN PARLIAMENT. She should then say that she had therefore decided to keep to the CONTENT OF ARTICLE 50, IN THE WITHDRAWAL AGREEMENT, which CLEARLY STATES THAT IF THERE IS NO AGREEMENT THEN THE UK LEAVES THE EU WITHOUT A DEAL. And within a reasonable time of her making that decision she could then, at least, RESIGN with DIGNITY and very likely ensure that ALL THE MILLIONS OF PREVIOUSLY CONSERVATIVE VOTERS, WHO ARE SO DISGUSTED WITH THE PARTY WHICH THEY USUALLY VOTED FOR, AND BECAUSE OF THAT HAVE SAID THAT THEY WOULD NEVER VOTE CONSERVATIVE AGAIN, MAY NOW CHANGE THEIR MINDS, THEREBY AVOIDING THE POTENTIAL DEMISE OF THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY.