SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TobagoJack who wrote (147604)4/3/2019 9:40:34 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Respond to of 217691
 
Males beat females in maths even though SAT scores are not adjusted for % of full brain size at the time of the test. Girls reach puberty and full brain size 3 years earlier than boys so it's a big deal.


I guess part of the problem for girls is that you can't teach an old dog new tricks. Girls should be taught maths at a younger age. Actually everybody should be taught individually according to their individual interests and ability. But in the commie system favoured by BS all are loaded into the government hopper and told CO2 is terrible, envy is good, racism is good (though paradoxically they claim the opposite), everyone is fungible, blather blather blather.





there were nearly 160 boys with SAT math scores between 700-800 points for every 100 girls with scores in that range. For the next highest 100-point range between 600-700 points for the 2016 SAT math test, there were about 120.4 boys with scores in that range for every 100 high school girls (5

Females are doomed by biology to not make it into the super topmost mathematical 10,000 worldwide. Their missing 3 years is too much. Actually, of 10,000 there should be some. I'd have to drag out some rusty maths to calculate how many. A mediocre female mathematician should be able to calculate how many in the top 10, 100, 1000, 10000 100000 in five minutes from that data.

Mqurice