SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Andrew H who wrote (13519)1/20/1998 11:55:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
Andy, I believe that the H&Q news involved Targretin for breast, prostate, NSCLC, and ovarian cancer.



To: Andrew H who wrote (13519)1/20/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 32384
 
I also expect the merger of AHP with SBH to be a major plus for LGND. AHP has licensed progestin agonosist and antagonist form LGND and they are slated to start TSE424 in the clinic. SBH has been working on small molecules to mimic Epogen. Kevin Wilson emphasized drug discovery and rapid drug development as being very important in today's environment, and as you know, LGND is grossly underfunded and really needs help from tehh big boys. If the merger goes through, they will have two alliances with the biggest boy (at least in terms of pharmaceutical sales).



To: Andrew H who wrote (13519)1/20/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Here's the latest from WSJ:
January 20, 1998

SmithKline Says It Is in Talks
To Merge With American Home

An INTERACTIVE JOURNAL News Roundup

SmithKline Beecham PLC Tuesday said it is in merger talks with
American Home Products Corp., a marriage that would create one of the
world's largest drug companies.

SmithKline's statement confirmed rumors of a deal that have swept
through financial markets since Friday. But SmithKline Beecham sought to
cast the discussions as preliminary. "There can be no assurances that any
such transaction will be agreed or as to what the terms of such transaction
would be," it said. SmithKline said it won't comment further until talks are
complete.

American Home Products, based in Madison, N.J., didn't make any
immediate comment on Tuesday. It refused to comment on Monday.

SmithKline broke its silence in response to the market speculation, which
has lifted many drug stocks since Friday. The rumors first surfaced late
Friday in the U.S. and prompted an immediate 7% surge in SmithKline
shares. SmithKline shares also jumped Monday in London, and they
continued to advance on Tuesday. The U.S. market was closed Monday.

Through midday in London on Tuesday, Smithkline was up 51 pence, or
6.9%, to 794 pence. Other drug stocks continued to rally in London,
including Zeneca, up 146 pence, or 6.4%, to 2,443 pence, and Glaxo
Wellcome, up 54 pence, or 3.3%, to 1,693 pence.

Analysts, who had been skeptical about the merger rumors, moved
quickly on Tuesday to examine the potential synergies between SmithKline
and American Home Products. The most obvious overlap lies in vaccines,
in which both companies are world leaders, they said.

They also believe American Home Products is eager to get its hands on
SmithKline's U.S. pharmacy-benefit manager unit, Diversified
Pharmaceutical Services Inc. Pharmacy-benefit managers are much sought
after by drug companies because of the influence they have over which
medicines are prescribed, and how much they cost. Other drug companies
with pharmacy benefit units include Merck and Co. and Eli Lilly & Co.

American Home Products has told analysts it has 60 potential products in
its pipeline that could be launched in the next six years. Joining forces with
SmithKline would ensure those products have a ready market if they gain
approval from the U.S. Food & Drug Administration.

For SmithKline Beecham, the merger would catapult the company back
among the heavy hitters of the drug industry. In the past few years,
SmithKline has slipped from its spot as the world's second-largest drug
company to around ninth currently.

A few questions remain, however, before a deal can be stitched up. Will
U.K. and U.S. regulatory authorities approve a deal that creates a
company with such a powerful position in the vaccines market? And it isn't
clear how the companies plan on dealing with the potential liabilities facing
American Home Products from class-action lawsuits following the
withdrawal of the diet drug Redux last year, which had been linked with
heart valve problems.



To: Andrew H who wrote (13519)1/20/1998 2:11:00 PM
From: Flagrante Delictu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
Andy, I gave as complete a report as I could via telephine to Henry Niman shortly after the breakout session ended last Tuesday. Henry did his usual extremely competent & professional job of recording & interpreting what I told him & presented it to you threadsters that same day. And fortunately so, because I left {accidently}, on the van that took me to the airport, my bag containing my notes. I will readily admit that the combination of 3 observers reporting back on a conference gives a wider perspective than only one. I think that is somewhat related to the fact that the presentations include quite a bit of info in their alloted 25 mins. & each observer has to try to synthesize & write down that which he or she finds most interesting while trying to listen also to what is continuing to be said while the synthesizing & notetaking are going on. I don't envy those whose livelihoods depend on their ability to acquire & report the most important aspects of the presentation. Lastly, my congatulations to medsunman & Vector 1 for the excellence of their reports. Bernie.



To: Andrew H who wrote (13519)1/21/1998 12:39:00 AM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Dow Jones on CEO Styles:
American Home, SmithKline CEOs Must
Bridge Gap In Styles

By Stephane Fitch

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Right now, two corporate chieftains, one a
tight-lipped former corporate lawyer from New Jersey, the other a garrulous
former tennis champion from Denmark, are trying to figure out if they can
work together.

That question is probably running through the minds of several people
involved in merger talks between pharmaceutical companies American
Home Products Corp. (AHP), headed by John Stafford, and SmithKline
Beecham PLC (SBH), with Jan Leschly at its helm.

Industry analysts say Stafford and Leschly are friendly. And Stafford is
believed to be considering retirement. Both factors might make it easier for
the two men to figure out who would be boss after a merger.

But until Stafford or Leschly leave the merged company, they'll have to find
a way to bridge the big gap between their backgrounds and their
management styles.

Stafford, 60, is invariably described as stoic. He started as American
Home's general counsel in 1970, and according to analysts who follow the
company, he has maintained a lawyer's guardedness since becoming the
company's chairman and chief executive in 1986.

In an age when many managements are talking about decentralizing and
promoting more initiative in the lower ranks, "American Home tends to be a
little more of a clear line-of-command-type management.," said Aros
Securities analyst David Maris. "They give their people a great amount of
leeway, but Stafford watches things closely."

Discussions about Stafford's strengths usually center on his intelligence and
toughness as a negotiator. "He's very direct and honest," Maris said. "He's
not a glad-handing manager who slaps you on the back a lot." Years ago,
Stafford's drug industry colleagues presented him with a Louisville Slugger
wrapped in a black velvet bag after he played a key role in negotiating a
controversial patent bill with Congress.

Stafford's reticence with the press fits in with tradition at American Home.
Though the company's products include medicine-cabinet staples like
Anacin, Chap Stick, and Robitussin, the company has always presented a
publicity-shy corporate image. When Stafford underwent successful surgery
for prostate cancer last November, a statement about the operation said
simply that Stafford would return to work in four weeks.

SmithKline's Leschly is from a whole other country, literally and figuratively.

Born in Denmark in 1940 and trained as pharmacist in Copenhagen, he
gained prominence as a tennis player, becoming the 10th-highest ranked
player in the world in the 1960s. His fierce competitiveness stayed with him
when he entered business. So did his ability to perform for an audience - he
often gives thoughtful interviews to the press.

Leschly says he encourages a "team" approach at SmithKline. That
management style has helped the company's employees enjoy their work, he
likes to say. He told the Financial Times of London last year that he resented
the "autocratic" management style at Squibb, where he worked before. He
left that company when it was swallowed up by rival Bristol-Meyers, now
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMY), in 1989.

Leschly is often described as "colorful" and "philosophical" by people who
have met him. Between his jobs at Squibb and SmithKline, he took courses
at Princeton University. SmithKline hired him because it needed a top
executive who could pull together the company's offices in London and
Philadelphia. Leschly has homes in both cities, and a beach house north of
Copenhagen.

He and Stafford may have at least one important thing in common: Both
have been criticized for being paid too much. Leschly, who was paid GBP 8
million in 1996, topped a list of most "overpaid" executives published by the
Sunday Times of London last year. Executives at similarly sized companies
got paid an average of GBP 6.5 million less, the paper reported.

In 1996, after Stafford was granted more than 500,000 stock options,
Graef Chystal, a compensation analyst, calculated that the American Home
executive was paid 53% more than most other chief executives at similarly
sized companies.

-By Stephane Fitch; 201-938-2202