SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (147686)4/9/2019 8:06:42 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 217570
 
Have no clear data, on this subject, but measuring changes within a few years is way too short. The Middle Age winter period or the Maunder minimum due to too few sunspots (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_Minimum) lasted more than a few decades, and at the time crop failure where abundant.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (147686)4/10/2019 6:08:04 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217570
 
a deep-state cockroach comes into the light

Bannon must have been jilted by Chinese girl once

the pole climber must also be a sympathiser of the CPD
scmp.com

Steve Bannon accuses US firms of selling out amid ‘enslavement of the Chinese people’

Former White House chief strategist says business and cultural ties with China have helped Communist Party dismantle world built on free citizenryStopping China’s advance ‘is the defining event of our time’, he says at Committee on the Present Danger: China event



Robert Delaney

Published: 12:00pm, 10 Apr, 2019



US President Donald Trump’s former adviser Steve Bannon has issued a blistering condemnation of McKinsey & Company, Goldman Sachs and an advocacy group representing some of the most prominent Chinese Americans, as he stepped up his rhetoric about the need for Washington to confront China.

Speaking on Tuesday at a Washington event organised by
the Committee on the Present Danger: China, or CPDC
– which also featured Senator Ted Cruz and former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich – Bannon excoriated groups that have promoted business and cultural ties with China.

These ties, the former White House chief strategist said, have assisted efforts by the Communist Party of China to dismantle an international order of the “nation state on the shoulders of a free citizenry” forged centuries ago in the West.

“All the McKinsey guys, all the Booz Allen [Hamilton] guys, all of the law firms, all of the accounting firms, Goldman Sachs, my old firm, all of the commercial banks, all of them” know about the Chinese government’s policies towards
Uygurs
and
Christians and other religious minorities
, and “the enslavement of the Chinese people”, Bannon said.

Efforts to stop China’s advance, as the United States did with the Soviet Union, “is the defining event of our time”, Bannon added.

“One hundred years from now, this is what they’re going to remember us for, and I guarantee you that we’re going to identify those members of the elite that sold us out and continue to sell out the American people and sell out the Chinese people.”

Booz Allen Hamilton said it does no business in China. McKinsey and Goldman Sachs did not immediately respond to queries sent about Bannon’s comments outside of regular business hours.

CPDC was launched to facilitate “public education and advocacy against the full array of conventional and non-conventional dangers” posed by the ruling Chinese Communist Party, the group said in an announcement last month.

Wednesday’s event in Washington was the first in a series of conferences planned by the group to raise awareness of its cause, the objectives of which include an abandonment of the Trump administration’s efforts to strike a deal that will end the US-China trade war that started last year.

Since then, US-China tensions have reached levels not seen since the establishment of formal diplomatic relations between Washington and Beijing 40 years ago. The CPDC seeks to amplify all of the outstanding issues that prompted Trump to slap punitive tariffs on imports from China, including barriers to the country’s domestic markets.

The group aims to expand the debate with warnings that
US telecom equipment makers are falling behind Chinese company Huawei
in the marketing of 5G mobile networks globally, and that the Chinese military’s technical prowess is becoming a dire threat to America’s military capability.

“Our vulnerability in space is profound,” said Cruz. “The Chinese are investing billions in offensive weaponry in space … It’s all fine and good to have a fifth-generation fighter aircraft, but do you know how to land it if GPS goes down?

“We need to be investing far more vigorously in defending space” to counter China’s eventual ability to jam US satellites, Cruz added.

The CPDC did not limit the targets of its opprobrium to business leaders and politicians who they say are not taking China’s ability to threaten the US seriously. Bannon also hit out at the Committee of 100, a Chinese-American advocacy group that includes Yahoo co-founder Jerry Yang, world-renowned cellist Yo-Yo Ma and the architect I.M. Pei.

“The Committee of 100, this highfalutin’ group of the best of the best,” Bannon said. “They put out a press release on Sunday … and guess what [they say] the problem is … this is about racial profiling. Tell that to the Chinese people that are enslaved.”

Also known as C100, the group bills itself as being “committed to a dual mission of promoting the full participation of Chinese Americans in all fields of American life, and encouraging constructive relations between the peoples of the United States and Greater China”.

The C100 had said in its press release that the group was “compelled to stand up and speak out against the racial profiling that has become increasingly common in the United States where Chinese Americans are being targeted as potential traitors, spies and agents of foreign influence”.

“Civil rights for Chinese Americans are about American ideals,” said Frank Wu, the C100’s chairman, in response to Bannon’s comments.



Trump plans to make trade war unbearable for China, Bannon says



“Concerns about China and how it has set up its society are a different issue. Due process for Chinese Americans should depend on American principles, not government policies in China.”

The singling out of particular groups as threats to American security is in the CPDC’s DNA. The Committee on the Present Danger (CPD) was first established in the early 1950s as a bulwark against the influence of communism in the US.

The CPD gained notoriety in its first iteration when it issued NSC 68, a policy directive that called on Congress to triple the US defence budget to counter the Soviet Union’s expansion. It disbanded after some leading members were drafted into the administration of Dwight Eisenhower,

The second CPD was formed in 1976 by defence hawks from the Democratic and Republican parties who disagreed with Washington’s policy of detente with the Soviet Union.

A CPDC founding member, Bannon
was also co-founder
of far-right news outlet Breitbart, which he described in an interview with American magazine Mother Jones as a “platform for the alt-right”.

Bannon is also known for being a former vice-president of Cambridge Analytica, the
now-defunct
data analysis firm that harvested the data of millions of Facebook users to predict and influence political movements.

The CPDC’s vice-chairman Frank Gaffney, who was a defence adviser to former president Ronald Reagan, said the committee was planning more conferences to amplify its concerns about China, and planned to invite leading figures in the Democratic Party including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.



To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (147686)4/12/2019 6:09:44 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217570
 
the Boyz are playing well together. Just wonderful.

connectivity connectivity connectivity

cooperation cooperation cooperation

etc etc etc

the planet is trending correct

zerohedge.com

EU And China Sign A Mandate For Trade Heaven Authored by Pepe Escobar via The Asia Times,

Beijing promises an investment deal by next year, to curb industrial subsidies and the need for tech transfers, while the EU promises its own transport network...



Sparks did fly in Brussels, but in the end the European Union and China managed to come up with an important joint statement at their summit this week, signed by Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and head of the European Council, Donald Tusk.

In theory, there’s agreement on three quite sensitive fronts: a complex, wide-ranging EU-China investment deal to be signed “by the end of next year, or earlier”, according to Li; Beijing to increasingly commit to erasing industrial subsidies and the obligation of technological transfers; and a substantial opening-up of the Chinese market to EU companies.

The EU is the largest combined market in the world and China’s top partner in trade, while China is the EU’s second largest trading partner. So, the EU-China summit on Tuesday was the real deal, unlike the endless Brexit soap opera.

Departing from concentric circles of posturing, the EU did not even blast China as a “systemic rival” – following the recent report EU-China: A Strategic Outlook. And there were no accusations of “unfair” trade hurled at Beijing.

Crucially, Brussels and Beijing seem to be finally engaging in building some sort of synergy between the New Silk Roads, or Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and something only Eurocrats know actually exists – the EU Connecting Europe and Asia project, which in theory should advance in conjunction with the Trans-European Transport Network – a rail, road and air connectivity drive.

Diplomats in Brussels said off-the-record that the run-up towards this entente cordiale was as bumpy as a trail in the Tibetan plateau. EU negotiators did try to walk away from the table without even talking to their Chinese counterparts, over Beijing’s much promised, and always delayed “market reforms”.

It’s as if the EU – in practice, the leading Franco-German duo – was trying to pull a Trump, employing hardcore pressure to extract concessions. It worked.

Before the summit, while the war of the sherpas was raging, with revision piling upon revision, Zhang Ming, China’s ambassador to the EU and its leading negotiator, did his best to dismiss the notion of China as a “systemic rival”. “In Chinese culture, rivals are bound to seek superiority over the other side,” he was quoted as saying.

Brussels demanded from the start that all rewrites to their agreement should be tacitly approved by the leadership in Beijing – which took no time to understand the powerful geoeconomic ramifications of a positive outlook, in contrast with the trade war still unresolved with the US. And that led to the breakthrough that finally made the EU swoon, a real-life timetable for those elusive Chinese “reforms”.

The joint statement reads in fact like a rose garden: “The high level of ambition will be reflected in substantially improved market access [and] the elimination of discriminatory requirements and practices affecting foreign investors.” The devil, of course, is in the details.

All the way to the 16+1From Beijing’s perspective, this spectacular trade and diplomatic victory smoothes the path towards the China and Central and Eastern Europe 16+1 summit in Dubrovnik on Friday. Of the European 16, no less than 11 are EU member states, while five are Western Balkans members.

Even as Li emphasizes at every turn Beijing’s firm interest in EU unity, one has to marvel at the Sun Tzu maneuver at the heart of the Chinese approach. No wonder some EU players incessantly carp at China’s divide-and-rule tactics.



Take for instance the Croatian angle. Croatia will sign a memorandum of understanding with Huawei, while the Croatian Railway Infrastructure and China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group will agree to set up a transportation corridor. Translation: smoother trade between Central Europe and ports in the Mediterranean, with China fast interlinking Greece, Italy and Croatia.

Slowly but surely, EU decisions are fast becoming integrated with the 16+1. Brussels Eurocrats actually examined the draft of deals that will be signed at the 16+1 summit in Dubrovnik. Unlike France, for instance, most of the 16+1 are enthusiastic participants in BRI – which, not by accident, is the star of the show, especially after Italy signed a memorandum of understanding to join New Silk Road projects last month.

Even as the EU lingers at designing what it still does not have – a comprehensive industrial policy – Beijing hits all the necessary buttons: free trade, multilateralism, globalization 2.0 – or even 3.0 or 4.0. Beijing essentially does not fear competing with EU firms.

After all, Beijing’s drive is to configure national champions in virtually every industrial and post-industrial sector, including preeminence in 5G and AI. The crux of the Chinese strategy is not the US but a close relationship with Europe, where opportunities to acquire first-class technology and first-class education are immense. Not to mention that Europe is BRI’s privileged terminal.

Perception is reality. There’s no doubt the Beijing leadership has understood that this EU-China agreement goes a long way to show, especially to its leaders, that they are dealing with a responsible emerging superpower. The contrast with the acrimony and intimidation tactics displayed throughout the US trade war could not be sharper.

Remember the delugeAt this stage, a flashback may be enlightening to put all that’s going on in perspective.

All the major religions of the book – Judaism, Christianity and Islam – share the same fable, according to which Noah, after the Deluge, divided the earth between his three sons. Shem got “Asia”, the lands considered the oldest, Ham got Africa, and Japheth got Europe.

It was only in the 18th century Europe that a noxious Christian equation went into full effect, articulating the curse of Ham, the color of a man’s skin, ethnic descent and slavery. That’s how the West justified racial slavery and the pillage of Africa – reduced to the status of a non-civilized space.

At the same time, under European (the land of Japheth) guidance, America was promoted as a land of colonization, and Asia (the land of Shem), as a land of economic exploitation. Judeo-Christian European elites had to admit the ancient brilliance of those Asian civilizations – Mesopotamia, India, China – but in the end they no more than integrated Asia in a new Orientalist narrative.

In parallel, based on the allegedly non-shameful character of Shem’s descendants, these elites forged a relatively common Semitic origin. And attributing Ham’s curse to a Muslim source, which for its part evoked Jewish sources, Christianity exonerated itself. The colonial, imperialist European project was on a roll.

But now China is back, for real, and for good, after a short historical interval. And the Chinese know all there is to know about European colonialism. Don’t expect Eurocrats fingering color-coded folders to have such long memories. But they certainly don’t need to study Admiral Zheng He’s travels to see which way the wind is blowing.