Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (117406)	4/9/2019 3:50:22 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 365050

But that event changed her view That event may have changed her personal attitude to a greater disposition to giving a challenged baby a chance to recover/progress. I do not see, however, a rational process from there to abandoning the pro-choice political position in favor of one that would dictate by law that everyone else continue aggressive treatment until natural death, which is the pro-life political position. The edge cases are inherently individual moral decisions for the parents. Exactly. And that's precisely what the pro-choice political position is--an individual moral decision by the parent. And you say that, after her experience, she would no longer permit that individual moral parental decision but substitute a one-size-fits-all legal mandate. I cannot connect those dots.