SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: C.K. Houston who wrote (9120)1/20/1998 12:39:00 PM
From: John Miz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 31646
 
Who cares. We've got 7 more trading days till the share holders meeting and probably less than a month for the 2nd qtr earnings report. That is all I'm focused on. Not all this side show stuff which will be rendered meaningless very shortly.

John



To: C.K. Houston who wrote (9120)1/20/1998 1:37:00 PM
From: Rob L.  Respond to of 31646
 
Cheryl, you are wrong about me and I am insulted that you question my intentions. Where do you come off as Ms. Righteous and why do you label me as a professional? I posted the exact filing from the source (cut and paste see below). You all had a chance to look at it then and no one made any reference that it could have been a sell. At least on the JBIL thread, they had the sense to question whether it was a buy or sell. Goes to show how many have blinders on on this thread. Here is the exact cut and paste and you try to tell me whether it is a buy or sell. I certainly and no expert on SEC documents.

Holder Registers TOPRO INC. Stock

Federal Filings via Dow Jones

FORM 144

ISSUER: TOPRO INC.
SYMBOL: TPRO

FILER: JENKINS JOHN
TITLE: Chief Executive Officer
BROKER: BT ALEX BROWN
SHARES REGISTERED: 3,411 DATE REGISTERED: 01/12/98

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(END) FEDERAL FILINGS-DOW JONES NEWS 01-15-98

As you can see, there is no mention of buy or sell. I misinterpreted the word registers as registers to buy. I got confused about registering to buy and registering to sell. Do you really think that the info that I posted as a buy was enough to move the stock? Do you really think that I was trying to hype the stock higher and then have it fall later. Come on already. It did not budge since I posted the info and I do not expect it to budge with the correction. As I have openly stated before, I am long at 6.5 so what motive could I possibly have for trying to pull a stunt like that. It was an honest mistake and I am trying to correct it. As for the second error on the JBIL thread, the same thing goes. The initial announcement made no mention of a buy or sell. It wasn't until a couple of days later that I found out it was a sell.

As for me conversing with MW. Hell, he is the only one that ever questions this company. Everyone else (for the most part) never wants to hear any differing opinion. Sometimes he gets a bit ridiculous, but most of the time he asks good questions IMO.



To: C.K. Houston who wrote (9120)1/20/1998 2:25:00 PM
From: JDN  Respond to of 31646
 
To All: You cant get anything past Mom--haha. JDN



To: C.K. Houston who wrote (9120)1/21/1998 4:09:00 AM
From: Mike Winn  Respond to of 31646
 
Dear CK - I just found a software tool that could help you tremendously in your research. I am grateful there is someone like you who is willing to sacrifice her own personal life for the good cause.

With this tool, instead of doing Yahoo-Search-Copy-Paste, now you can do WordCruncher-Copy-Paste and you can search for complete expression such as "embedded Y2K doomsday apocalypse testament bible Noah bagel meltdown" etc.

Survivor Mike.

P.S. CK, you were right about Rob L.

===========================================

Small Utah Co Tries 'Craziness' With Search Engine Auction

By Mark Boslet

PALO ALTO, Calif. -- Silicon Valley executives like to break new ground with their products and technologies. Now a small Provo, Utah, software company aims to break new ground with its sales method.
WordCruncher Publishing Technologies Inc. wants to auction to the highest bidder a license for its WordCruncher search engine software - technology developed by Brigham Young University researchers for finding computer information.
So last week it faxed rather breathless bulletins, without the company's name attached, to the chief executives of 41 prominent technology firms, including Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) and Internet navigation market leader Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO). The bulletin - to be followed this week by a more detailed mailing that will identify the company and include a software sample - made the claim that come Groundhog Day, the day of the auction, all other Web search technology will become obsolete.
It's no surprise that industry executives find the assertion hard to believe.
But it's no surprise, either, that WordCruncher sees a need to go to such lengths. Internet navigation is dominated by several large, well-established sites, such as Yahoo and Excite Inc. (XCIT), and this unusual promotional effort reflects "how tough it is to establish an identity in search-and-retrieval technology," said Ron Rappaport, an analyst at Zona Research Inc.
"It's a giant marketing attempt to draw attention to another technology," he said.
But there actually may be some truth to the WordCruncher claim. Mark Cannon, a former project manager at General Electric Co.'s (GE) Schenectady, N.Y., research center, was sent by GE to examine WordCruncher, and came away impressed.
"Nobody has done what they've done," said Cannon, who now runs a small business in Utah. "They've still got a couple years lead" on other search technologies.
Any advantage would clearly be valuable to Internet surfers, increasingly frustrated by the hundreds, and many times thousands, of responses they get to Web queries.
Cannon said the software stands out for its ability to search in numerous languages. Beyond English, it understands Chinese, Japanese, Hebrew, Eastern European languages and many other tongues, WordCruncher officials say.

May Be Too Late To Win Share Of Market

The search program also does better proximity searching, allowing users to whittle down the number of responses they get, Cannon said. For example, someone interested in the migratory patterns of North American butterflies might type in the keywords "butterfly" and "Mexico," and expect the search engine to find information about butterflies that winter in Mexico.

WordCruncher Executive Vice President James W. Johnston also said the software gives users greater information about responses by printing surrounding sentences and phrases with keyword searches.

Still, industry executives are skeptical. Yahoo! looks at interesting technology, said Farzad Nazem, senior vice president, but "I wouldn't say the door is way open." Far too many people have technology they think is revolutionary, he said.

"We always look at technology," agreed Infoseek Corp.'s (SEEK) Leo Jolicoeur, vice president of product management and business operations. But Infoseek already offers proximity searching, he said.

In all likelihood, "it's too late" for a company such as WordCruncher to break into the Internet navigation business, said Keith E. Benjamin, an analyst at BancAmerica Robertson Stephens. "The game is over."

But WordCruncher Chief Executive M. Daniel Lunt, a former vice president at WordPerfect Corp., isn't dissuaded. Already Oracle Corp. (ORCL) and Sun Microsystems Inc. (SUNW) have expressed some interest in looking at the technology, he said.

And while the auction idea "has a slight aura of craziness about it," he admitted,"I think it will get some attention."

And if the attention generates a sale, that could mean - depending on the type of license a company wants - anywhere from $10 million to $60 million for WordCruncher, he said.