Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (681914)	4/18/2019 10:54:10 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793896

I'm pretty sure I heard Barr say "Russian spies". Surprised me when he said it. I'll check the transcript when it comes out.

To: Bill who wrote (681914)	4/18/2019 11:39:29 AM
From: skinowski	3 Recommendations Recommended By alanrs Maurice Winn SirWalterRalegh Respond to of 793896

Guccifer was the guy who claimed he used to check HRC's server at will, just to see what's going on in the world. He also claimed that on many occasions he saw evidence of other outside parties checking it out at the same time, as well. It's a scandal that never happened... was shut down ASAP.

To: Bill who wrote (681914)	4/18/2019 9:51:22 PM
From: sense	3 Recommendations Recommended By alanrs Bill Tom Clarke Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793896

The problems with the DNC hack story revolve around only two or three things 1. ) The dates... Republican House was trying to pin it down as "So, when did the FBI investigation begin"? That date kept shifting back as they asked more questions. Some people clearly did lie to Congress about that date ? Why ? The Republicans seem convinced the date they have ended up with, as the "final answer" from the FBI, in mid July of 2016, is a lie. Why ? Look at the chronology... noting clusters in the dates ? Why so many articles dated July 26 2016 ? 2.) Where did Assange source his materials ? Only he knows. Everyone else has an opinion. 3.) We were sold a bill of goods, forever, on the Steele Dossier being legit... we know now that it was a Hillary paid for dirty trick (and a crime... that spawned more crimes), but "the FBI" took it, accepted it, pushed it, presented it to the FISA court... and only now, two plus years later, are we finally digging out from under that pile of dung with the truth that, no, Trump is not a Russian agent. (But Assange is ? LOL!!!) . That very same (known corrupt) FBI refused to take the (known corrupt) DNC's server to look at it themselves, and instead simply accepted the same (known corrupt) Democrats paid for work in (known corrupt) Crowdstrike's paid for opinion... same thing as with the Dossier... and we're still pretending that's legit ? Why ? Noting those three issues, here's a few links worth having as resources as this plays out: : Wikipedia: DNC E-mail Leak Wikipedia: Guccifer 2.0 Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't Buy the Russia Story Discussion by Hackers re "Why Some U.S. Ex-Spies Don't buy the Russia Story" The link above contains a lot of VERY obvious "spin" being applied... in hindsight effort made in tracking that down might be more revealing than expected when it was posted... but also note how few seemed to be buying it. Hackers know computers... you won't baffle them with BS about that. Note the date: Croudstrike (June 15 2016) crowdstrike.com "are believed to be closely linked to the Russian government’s powerful and highly capable intelligence services" Seth Rich Channeled Seth Rich murder: early on Sunday morning, July 10th, 2016.