SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (681916)4/18/2019 11:01:26 AM
From: DMaA  Respond to of 793927
 
They may have evidence that Guccifer is a Russian Agent. It's possible Assange did not know that.



To: Bill who wrote (681916)4/18/2019 11:04:51 AM
From: aladin  Respond to of 793927
 
Well, if that's the case, then Assange certainly did lie.

Not at all. The attribution of Guccifer happened later, at the time he was thought to be a Romanian hacker now differentiated as Guccifer 1.0. The attribution of the individuals now called Guccifer 2.0 happened in 2018.



To: Bill who wrote (681916)4/18/2019 12:51:25 PM
From: Sdgla10 Recommendations

Recommended By
Alan Smithee
alanrs
Bill
niceguy767
Old_Sparky

and 5 more members

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793927
 
I believe there was a study that showed the volume of data taken from the dnc server could only have been accomplished with a flash drive not a hack and Assange confirmed that. Seth Rich remains the hero that shed daylight on Hillary & Podesta’s treachery imo.