Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (1130498)	4/18/2019 8:47:43 PM
From: Heywood40	2 Recommendations Recommended By rdkflorida2 sylvester80 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574761

Over the weekend, Republicans for the Rule of Law will air an advertisement on Fox News urging GOP lawmakers to hold FatRump accountable for “lying” and “obstructing justice,” like Republicans had done with former Democratic President Bill Clinton more than 20 years ago, when a GOP-led House succesfully impeached Clinton on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. Clinton was subsequently acquitted on all charges after a trial in the Senate. “The Mueller Report revealed multiple instances of President FatRump lying and obstructing justice. Twenty years ago, Republicans denounced a Democratic president for lying and obstructing justice,” the 34-second advertisement’s opening reads, before cutting to old clips of GOP lawmakers condemning Clinton on Capitol Hill. “Republicans stood for the rule of law then. We should stand for the rule of law now,” it concludes. “It's clear from the report today that there's a lot of political interference that was attempted [by FatRump],” Sarah Longwell, executive director of Republicans for the Rule of Law, told Newsweek. “This is not the end of the Mueller investigation, this is just the beginning. It looks like the Mueller report really is a road map for Congress. And that *there was no exoneration, definitely obstruction*.”

To: locogringo who wrote (1130498)	4/19/2019 1:44:46 AM
From: bruwin	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Respond to of 1574761

"Mueller wanted FatRump charged" Really ???!! "Charged" for what ??? ...... 1) "Collusion" ?? ..... If you want to charge someone for Collusion you NEED EVIDENCE !! Mueller, himself stated THAT AFTER 2 YEARS AND SPENDING OVER $30 MILLION HE FOUND EFF ALL EVIDENCE. 2) "Obstruction of Justice" ?? But President Trump ORDERED the White House to CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION ... PLUS PRESIDENT TRUMP NEVER APPLIED ANY EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AT ANY TIME AS HE WAS PERFECTLY ENTITLED TO DO .... PLUS PRESIDENT TRUMP NEVER FIRED MUELLER WHICH HE COULD HAVE DONE AT ANY TIME, EVEN IF HE DIDN'T LIKE MUELLER'S HAIRCUT, BECAUSE A PRESIDENT HAS THE POWER TO FIRE AN INDIVIDUAL, WORKING IN THE POSITION THAT MUELLER WAS IN, ANYTIME THAT HE WANTS TO. Jeez !!! ..... These Extreme Leftist Morons are so STUPID and lacking in any semblance of INTELLIGENCE AND UNDERSTANDING it's UNBELIEVABLE ..... Now you know why I have those 18 IDIOTS on IGNORE and SWITCHED OFF !!