SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Honest Conservatives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sense who wrote (2258)4/18/2019 10:27:54 PM
From: sense  Respond to of 3350
 
A chronology ?

Inside story: How Russians Hacked the Democrats' emails


Papadopoulos documents offer new insight on DNC email hacking timeline.


Remember... the FBI says it was July 16 before they started any investigation re Trump/Russia ?

But, but... we know Papadopoulous was already being set up by the FBI with a spy... who the FBI had recruited to "clairvoyantly" tell him about the Russian hacking of Hillary... even before March of 2016... before the "Russian" hack had even happened ? (the reason the R's House wanted to determine McCabe's European travel itinerary... overlapping with Papadopoulos's... re McCabe's working with MI-6... to get Trump) Then, when Mr. P told what the FBI hired spy had told him... to an Aussie, who was also set up by the FBI... and who told the FBI what P said... that is why they then said they needed to monitor him... and got the FISA warrant... because he was "working for the Russians"... which was all and only really the FBI all along ?

A former FBI informant... Papadopoulos then, having already been set up by the FBI to learn about the "russians" hacking Hillary... before it happened... only later, became associated with the Trump campaign ? Wow. What an amazing coincidence.

The Russians got the green light from Obama to use computers to cause mayhem... so they did...

But, then, the rest... looks like Obama/Hillary dirty tricks all the way...



To: sense who wrote (2258)4/20/2019 7:46:24 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3350
 
This shows a problem in US politics..

The greater story is not about Mr. Trump's possible collusion with the Russians..

BUT the fact at the Russians could in fact influence outcomes in US elections..

No secret that I not a fan of Mr. Trump.. I think he is a pig dog of a man.. HOWEVER.. that does not make him a bad prez.. It pains me to say this but He was a BETTER choice than Ms. Clinton..

One redeeming factor in my mind for Mr. Trump is that he does not appear to be bought and paid for.. self focused, likely dishonest , sometime liar and cheat (well documented) .. I am sure.. but he is his own man it appears.. Ms. Clinton appeared bought and paid for.. The Dems lost the election more than Mr. Trump winning it.. The Sanders affair was a travesty.. whether one likes hi politics or not.. and IMO sent more votes for change Mr. Trump's way..

To my point on Mr. Trump above... Our first Canadian PM MacDonald was a drunk and a racist rat bastard.. yet he succeeded in creating a united Canada.. It is hard when politics is a popularity contest..