SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 3bar who wrote (19438)4/19/2019 8:43:43 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37496
 
I readily admit that most people are more interested in proving that they have been right than in actually being right. So I am not going to argue that global warming advocates are unbiased. On the other hand, I see no reason why they are wrong given that the average global temperatures have been steadily rising. And for anyone who believes NASA and NOAA conspire to lie about the data, animal and insect evidence also confirms the warming.

Being an evidence oriented person, I am willing to enter a wager. If any year over the next 5 years is cooler than any year than 10 years before it or the average temperature over the next 5 years is less than or equal to the previous 5 years average, then you win. Otherwise I win.

Fair?



To: 3bar who wrote (19438)4/20/2019 6:36:21 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum1 Recommendation

Recommended By
3bar

  Respond to of 37496
 
Start with university// trendy research gets the dollars.. Folks mostly do not know how we are controlled..

When Sheldon on Big Bang theory.. (a show I used to watch before it got too long in the tooth) had to relinquish String Theory research.. it was actually salient yet subtle social commentary on our times.. Missed by 99% I suspect..