SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Justin Banks who wrote (16446)1/20/1998 6:54:00 PM
From: Keith Hankin  Respond to of 24154
 
It seems to me that the judge can issue a decision that is simple without having to micro-manage the decisions for MSFT. He can order them to separate the DLLs, files, etc that are only used by IE from the stuff that is needed by other applications. The former would be deliverable as IE, the latter as an OS Service Pack. And if MSFT wants to be able to make it so other applications can directly call into IE, then they should publish an open API so that any browser vendor can plug into it. I don't think that this is such a hard thing to do, technically.



To: Justin Banks who wrote (16446)1/20/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: John Donahoe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24154
 
MSFT asserts:

"Microsoft's filing asserts that even the government's own witness couldn't identify a set of files that Microsoft could have allowed computer manufacturers to remove as way of complying with Judge Jackson's ruling."

Where is the lie? If you know where the mysterious IE files are why don't you notify Justice. They're floundering and need your help. Do your duty

JD