SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (148251)5/2/2019 11:57:08 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Respond to of 218705
 
Hence my disappointment



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (148251)5/2/2019 8:15:30 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218705
 
in the mean time, nothing about 737 max

but something else that others could argue are systemic, cultural, etc etc etc any such same rot as spewed by haters

zerohedge.com

NASA Defrauded By Metals Company Blamed For $700 Million In Losses And Two Failed LaunchesAn Oregon-based metals manufacturer faked test results and provided faulty materials to NASA, which the agency says caused over $700 million in losses and two failed satellite launches, according to the results of an internal investigation.



Hydro Extrusion Portland, Inc. - formerly known as Sapa Profiles, Inc., (SPI) falsified thousands of certifications for aluminum components over a 19-year period for hundreds of customers, including NASA.

When the launch of NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory and Glory missions failed in 2009 and 2011, the agency said it was because their launch vehicle malfunctioned. The clamshell structure (called fairing) encapsulating the satellites as they traveled aboard Orbital ATK's Taurus XL rocket failed to separate on command. Now, a NASA Launch Services Program (LSP) investigation has revealed that the malfunction was caused by faulty aluminum materials. - Engadget

SPI would generally alter the tests in one of two ways. Between 1996 and 2006, an SPI plant manager "led a scheme to make thousands of handwritten alterations to failing test results by changing failing numbers that fell below the minimum required test results to appear to be passing," according to the Justice Department. Then, from around 2002 through 2015, SPI testing lab supervisor Dennis Balius "led a scheme to alter tests within SPI’s computerized systems and provide false certifications with the altered results to customers." He also instructed employees to routinely violate other testing standards, such as increasing the speed of the testing machines or cutting samples in a way that did not meet testing standards.

Balius was sentenced to three years in prison and ordered to pay more than $170,000 in restitution.

"When testing results are altered and certifications are provided falsely, missions fail," said NASA's Director for launch services, Jim Norman, who added that years of scientific work were lost because of the fraud.

The Oregon company has agreed to pay $46 million for the fraud, including $34.1 million in combined restitution to NASA, the Department of Defense’s Missile Defense Agency (MDA), and commercial customers. They will also forfeit $1.8 million in ill-gotten gains.

"Corporate and personal greed perpetuated this fraud against the government and other private customers, and this resolution holds these companies accountable for the harm caused by their scheme," said Brian Benczkowski, assistant attorney general of the criminal division at the Department of Justice, in an April 23 statement reported by Bloomberg.

A Norsk Hydro spokesman said that the case was settled, and that it had invested "significant time and resources to completely overhaul our quality and compliance organizations."




To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (148251)5/3/2019 6:06:23 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
dvdw©

  Respond to of 218705
 
deep-state enablers wants money

ft.com

US labour leader warns of ‘inferior’ China trade dealAFL-CIO’s Trumka fears agreement will lack restraints on Beijing’s industrial subsidies

Richard Trumka: 'We’ll give the agreement a fair, honest, look, and if it’s a good agreement, then we’ll do what we can to support it' © AFPRichard Trumka, America’s top union leader, has warned Donald Trump that he risks striking an “inferior agreement” with China to end the trade war if he fails to rein in Beijing’s use of industrial subsidies, raising pressure on US negotiators in the final stretch of talks with Beijing.

The 69-year-old president of the AFL-CIO said the deal being hashed out between US and Chinese officials did not seem to contain anything “very earth shattering or very helpful” to rebalance the trade relationship between the two countries, he said in an interview with the Financial Times.

In particular, he urged Robert Lighthizer, the US trade representative, and Steven Mnuchin, the US Treasury secretary, to secure binding commitments from China to prevent currency manipulation and restrain the use of industrial subsidies. Some currency measures are expected to be included in the deal, but big curbs to subsidies are not thought to be part of the agreement, according to people familiar with the text.

“[The Chinese] circumvent comparative advantage by underwriting the cost of their uncompetitive industries or by targeting an industry and subsidising [it]. That has to come to a screeching halt,” said Mr Trumka. “If the agreement doesn’t do that, and gives us a way to enforce it, then it will be an inferior agreement. And it’ll be another opportunity, a great opportunity, missed.”

If they go [on] the side of Wall Street, a couple of billionaires will benefit from it and do just fine, but the rest of the American people won’t do that
Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO
Mr Trumka’s reservations are significant because they highlight the risk of a political backlash against Mr Trump if he is seen as striking a weak deal.

While US labour unions generally favour Democrats, they have been sympathetic to the president’s protectionist stance on trade. A rejection of the China deal by Mr Trumka, who has led the AFL-CIO labour federation for a decade, would be a big blow to Mr Trump’s hopes of claiming that his deal will benefit rust belt voters who backed him in droves in the 2016 presidential election.

Speaking in a Washington office decorated with memorabilia celebrating past political and union campaigns as well as the Pittsburgh Steelers American football team, Mr Trumka said the president would be making a “colossal mistake” if he favoured Wall Street over US workers in the China deal.

“If they go [on] the side of Wall Street, a couple of billionaires will benefit from it and do just fine, but the rest of the American people won’t do that. It will continue to hurt our economy and our ability to be a world power, because we are losing that capacity,” Mr Trumka said.

He warned that the US president was already losing his hold on union members. “They are coming back across the bridge,” he said. “Unfortunately for [Mr Trump] the list of things he’s done to hurt [members] massively outweighs the number of things he’s done to help them.”

Mr Lighthizer and Mr Mnuchin were in China this week for talks that the White House labelled “productive”. Liu He, China’s vice-premier, will be in Washington next week for what could be the final round of negotiations before a signing summit between Mr Trump and Xi Jinping, the Chinese president.

“We’ll give the agreement a fair, honest, look, and if it’s a good agreement, then we’ll do what we can to support it. If it isn’t, we’ll say what we think is wrong,” Mr Trumka said of any potential deal.

Mr Trumka has also been critical of the USMCA, a trade deal to replace Nafta signed by Mr Trump last year with his counterparts from Canada and Mexico. The agreement is facing an uphill battle in the US Congress to secure ratification, partly because trade unions and Democrats have said it does not ensure enforceable labour standards in Mexico and offers excessively good terms on exclusive data protection for pharmaceutical companies.

Mick Mulvaney, the White House chief of staff, this week stepped up the pressure on Congress to approve the USMCA by saying the US was prepared to pull out of Nafta if lawmakers did not ratify the agreement. Mr Trumka rejected the threat and insisted that changes to the deal were essential.

“That’s not the way to get to yes. It was a take-it-or-leave-it attitude,” Mr Trumka said. “And quite frankly the American people deserve better than that. So I hope they will reconsider and actually work with us to get to yes, because this agreement right now is premature.”

While many lobbyists and aides on Capitol Hill believe it would be increasingly difficult to ratify USMCA as the 2020 presidential race approaches, Mr Trumka said this was no reason to rush it through. “No one should be slave to a clock,” he said. “If you get this right, all of us would support it.”




To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (148251)5/3/2019 7:26:05 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 218705
 
in case you missed below ... the article says 737 max is a lemon

zerohedge.com

Boeing Limited Pilot Testing Of Anti-Stall Software Suspected In 2 Fatal Crashes

Though it hasn't made much of a difference in the share price, the Wall Street Journal has been publishing one groundbreaking (and, for Boeing, deeply embarrassing) scoop after another about how the aerospace company either mislead its largest customer and the FAA about disabling critical safety alerts on the 737 MAX 8, or simply wasn't aware that the alerts had been disabled (it's not entirely clear which is the case).

And on Friday, with Boeing shares still inexplicably up double-digits on the year despite new orders having ground to a halt and the grounding of the 737 MAX having no end in sight, WSJ published its latest bombshell about Boeing's mishandling of the MCAS rollout, reporting that Boeing had limited the role of test pilots in the final stages of development. These pilots also lacked key details about the system and, importantly, the alerts that would signal to pilots when MCAS was malfunctioning.



Boeing CEO Tries To regain Investor Confidence

This is extremely puzzling, because as has previously been reported, MCAS marked an unprecedented level of automation in the new generation of the 737. One would think Boeing would want to get as much human input as possible to stress test the system, especially since the new Boeing jets would rely on a single sensor to feed into the system.

For what it's worth, Boeing has denied the report. However, given WSJ's track record on Boeing-related scoops, it appears likely that this revelation will lead to increased scrutiny of Boeing from the FAA as the aerospace company tries to win approval for its updated MCAS software from the FAA.

As a result, Boeing test pilots and senior pilots involved in the MAX’s development didn’t receive detailed briefings about how fast or steeply the automated system known as MCAS could push down a plane’s nose, these people said. Nor were they informed that the system relied on a single sensor—rather than two—to verify the accuracy of incoming data about the angle of a plane’s nose, they added.
Investigators have linked faulty sensor data to the flight-control system’s misfire, which led to crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia that took 346 lives.

The extent of pilots’ lack of involvement hasn’t been previously reported and could bring fresh scrutiny from investigators and regulators already looking into Boeing’s design and engineering practices. It isn’t clear whether greater pilot participation would have altered the ultimate design of the flight-control system. But the scaling back of pilots’ involvement and their lack of detailed knowledge about the plane’s system add to the list of questions about engineering and design practices facing the Chicago-based aerospace giant.
A Boeing spokesman said test pilots and senior pilots didn’t have less of a role in the design, briefing and testing of the final version of MCAS when compared with their counterparts who worked on previous models featuring important new systems.

"Listening to pilots is an important aspect of our work," the spokesman said. "Their experienced input is front and center in our mind when we develop airplanes. We share a common priority - safety - and we listen to them carefully."

Though WSJ caveats its story by writing that it's unclear whether the pilots' input would have made a difference in its ultimate design, we imagine their involvement might have tipped off Boeing to the difficulties pilots faced in bringing a mis-firing MCAS under control. Remember, the team investigating the Ethiopian Airlines crash revealed that MCAS fired four times before it ultimately doomed all 157 people aboard the flight. Maybe, if the test pilots had experienced something similar and been able to warn Boeing about this defect, nearly 350 people - the total number aboard ET302 and the Lion Air flight that crashed just minutes after takeoff back in October - wouldn't have had to die.