SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rambi who wrote (788)1/20/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4710
 
>Alex poopoos my AHD<
If that's bait, I'm half into the boat already!
It would be correct to say that I poohpooh your AHD. I'm to polite to say what I poopoo, at least on this thread. (Try Rambi.)
>it is by now so common that it
cannot be considered an error. <
It's this sort of weak-willed pandering which raises my wrath at the AHD. Language is not a plaything of the masses. It is the proper privilege and implement of the Elite. Just 'acuzza everyone is saying something does not make it right!
Rant Factor Four, Mr. Sulu



To: Rambi who wrote (788)1/20/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: Thom A. Shulok  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 4710
 
Okay, enough lurking, time to stick my head in the piranha bucket...

As a student of predictive linguistics, I think the short i is more economical from the verbo-musculative perspective. Try saying the -liv fragment both ways: long i and short i. The long i involves a glottal (the vibration deep in your throat) that requires more effort and may demonstrate slightly more barbaric undertones. The short i simply requires far less effort to execute. Given that most people are like electrons (path of least resistance) and really hate to project the appearance of barbarism in these enlightened times, it might be reasonable to expect the long i version to disappear entirely, except among isolated groups of overachieving barbaric types.

Thom