SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: philv who wrote (148379)5/8/2019 3:40:02 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217943
 
China is merely first practicing on Canada, as Canada is directly responsible for a kidnapping

China is trying to convince Canada to repent, and not go through w/ committing a crime

UK already told US to take a hike, but USA is not taking the hint

UK does not want to be Canada-ed

this is one of many reasons why Canada infraction must not go unanswered, hard, and such that Canada shall think a gazzilion times before trying any same protocol in the future

should Canada fail to heed counsel, China has no time for Canada

diplomacy is kept simplest when one holds to steady principles whatever they may be and does not waffle, because those who practices waffling can be made to blink, often, almost as a matter of course

let's watch



To: philv who wrote (148379)5/8/2019 3:51:59 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217943
 
it is very important to hit Canada hard, as a criminal ought to be

but perhaps not because Canada has done a kidnapping

watch the waffling now in progress

the blinking stage is supposedly in October

the fear expressed by the USA is hilarious, over a telephone system that would be supplied to the world bar none

tragic if and when either Ericsson and/or Nokia goes down for the count and customers stranded in orphaned systems

bloomberg.com

Canada Puts Huawei 5G Decision on Back Burner With Allies Split

Josh Wingrove9 May 2019, 02:27 GMT+8



Huawei Mate X foldable 5G mobile device
Photographer: Stefan Wermuth/BloombergThe Canadian government believes there’s now less urgency to make a decision on whether to ban Huawei Technologies Co. from 5G telecommunications systems -- and that decision could now come after the October federal election, officials familiar with the matter say.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government believes it’s facing less pressure from telecommunications firms than before to make a decision, the officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the matter.

Canada had expected to move more quickly, though its Five Eyes allies remain divided. Three of the countries -- Canada, the U.K. and New Zealand -- are deliberating what to do about Huawei while a fourth, the U.S., wants allies to restrict the firm. The fifth, Australia, has already banned Huawei from 5G. Split decisions could lead the allies to claw back cooperation in certain areas.

As of January, Canada was still said to be months away from a decision, though some officials expected it before the election. The timing is now up in the air. Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said in April the government was working on technical issues but was pushing to get to a decision, in part “to ensure that Canadians enjoy the full benefits of this important new technology.”

‘Due Course’The government is “carefully assessing the security challenges and potential threats involved in future 5G technology, while recognizing the potential this technology holds for Canadians,” Scott Bardsley, a spokesman for Goodale, said Wednesday in an email. “We will be taking appropriate decisions in due course to ensure that our networks are kept safe for Canadians.”



Photographer: Jimmy Jeong/Bloomberg
Many analysts expect Canada to ban Huawei, though the country’s decision is fraught with political tension after its arrest of Huawei Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou, who is facing extradition to the U.S. and appeared in court Wednesday. Since Meng’s arrest, China has seized two Canadians, blocked Canadian crop exports and sentenced two other Canadians to death on drug charges.

A Huawei ban could risk further straining ties, as China demands Meng’s release. The China standoff is not the driving force on the timing of any Huawei decision, one of the officials said.

New Zealand has taken steps to block the telecom, though its Prime Minister says no final decision has been made. The U.K. is said to be leaning toward restrictions instead of a full ban, while Prime Minister Theresa May also forced out a cabinet minister over a leak about Huawei. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened an executive order targeting Huawei, but said it could be part of a trade deal with China.

Telus Corp. and BCE Inc.’s Bell Canada would be most heavily affected by a Huawei ban. Rogers Communications Inc. uses Ericsson AB of Sweden and wouldn’t be affected. Telus has warned of the potential fallout and cost of a ban.

Huawei, Telus, Bell and Rogers didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.



To: philv who wrote (148379)5/8/2019 3:55:21 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217943
 
<<unbecoming>>

perhaps by doing what merely seems to be unbecoming, hit Canada hard to punish criminality, team China is exposing the true unbecoming

that a nation state hopes to get away with yet another special rendition kidnapping, and a state betrays an alliance member, again, habitually, systemically, ...

washingtonpost.com

Canada arrested Meng for the U.S. As China retaliates, it’s on its own


Emily Rauhala


Huawei Technologies Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou arrives with Scot Filer, CEO of Lions Gate Risk Management, in the parking garage of the British Columbia Supreme Court in Vancouver in March. (Lindsey Wasson/Reuters)In its diplomatic battle with China, Canada could use some backup. But its closest ally, the United States, seems to be occupied waging other wars.

Since Canada arrested a Chinese technology executive on U.S. charges in December, China has hit Canada hard, detaining two Canadians on vague allegations and stopping some imports of canola oil, a key Canadian product.

The U.S. officials seeking to extradite Huawei Technologies’ chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, offered Canada a polite “thanks” for arresting her. But as China punishes Canada for fulfilling the U.S. request, there has been little help from the White House, which is focused, for now, on cutting a trade deal with China.

With Meng due in a Vancouver courtroom Wednesday for a hearing to schedule the start of the extradition process, an exasperated Canada is bracing for further political or economic retaliation from Beijing — and no longer expecting much from Washington.

“Not only are we navigating around a hostile China, but we need to do that without all the guarantees and protections that we have had in the past,” said David Mulroney, who served as Canada’s ambassador to China from 2009 to 2012.

The Canadian conundrum raises a question familiar to small countries that have found themselves in China’s bad books: How do you stand up to a soon-to-be-superpower, particularly without clear, consistent U.S. support?

So far, Canada has struggled.

[ In a twist, Canada asks U.S. for help cracking down at its southern border]

Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer of Huawei Technologies, leaves her house for a hearing at the British Columbia Supreme Court in Vancouver in March. (Jimmy Jeong/Bloomberg)The conflict between Canada and China started with Meng’s arrest in December on charges that she violated U.S. sanctions law by misstating her company’s relationship with a subsidiary.

Her arrest outraged Beijing. Soon, two Canadians in China, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, were detained on national security allegations that have yet to be explained. Then, a Canadian who had been sentenced to 15 years in Chinese prison for drug smuggling was hastily retried and sentenced to death.

Beijing has cast Meng’s arrest as a politically motivated foreign plot to contain China.

Ottawa has argued her arrest was a routine law enforcement matter, stressing that Canada was adhering to the terms of its extradition treaty with the United States, and that Meng will be treated just like anyone else — an argument it expected to be echoed by the United States.

Instead, President Trump shocked both Canadian and U.S. officials by tweeting that he would consider intervening in Meng’s case if it could help him secure a favorable deal on trade.

U.S. officials have since tried to walk that back, expressing the country’s commitment to the rule of law and, at a news conference to unveil a range of charges against Huawei, thanking Canadian allies for their help. But uncertainty over the U.S. position lingers.

Canadian officials know that a Trump tweet is not a policy statement and have tried to engage other U.S. officials. They have regularly raised the detention of the two Canadians with American colleagues.

Jim Carr, Canada’s minister for international trade diversification, said the government is discussing the situation with allies “literally every day.”

“When you need your friends, you talk to your friends about how you need them,” he said during a visit to Washington this week. “Our American allies are aware of the situation.”

[ Quebec ban on religious symbols would fall heavily on hijab-wearing teachers]

Security guards march past a shop selling Apple and Huawei phones in Beijing. (Ng Han Guan/AP)Some are frustrated that this awareness has not translated into action.

Canada’s ambassador to the United States, David MacNaughton, has pointed out that Canada is cooperating with the United States on several fronts, including Venezuela and NATO. He told Reuters last week that it might be less inclined to continue that assistance if it keeps getting nothing back.

“How do you go to canola farmers and relatives of the two [Canadian detainees] and say, ‘Well, actually, notwithstanding all of this, we’re going to try and do whatever we can to help?’” he asked.

“It makes it much more difficult in public-opinion terms for the prime minister to have permission to do some of the things that would be in both countries’ interests.”

A Canadian official familiar with the issue said Canada was not about to change course on questions of foreign policy such as the crisis in Venezuela — but is indeed exasperated.

“We hope they will help us anyway,” said the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “This is causing some pain on our side, and we want to see a meaningful commitment from the rule of law on their side.”

Carr’s job is to find new trading partners for Canada, which has long been heavily dependent on the United States. He said the dust-up reaffirmed the importance of his mandate.

“It makes sense, both in the medium and the long term, to develop other relationships, because you don’t how bilateral relationships will go.”