Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tanoose who wrote (4416)	1/20/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: c.r. earle	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10836

Frank, and all <<From an aquaintance of mine who spoke with the PR person of PDG, just this afternoon, he claims that PDG is just as frustrated over this whole thing as anyone else, and this may be a reason as to why they are suspending operations>> To anyone that has been following this saga closely for the last year or so, you must agree that this comment or assertion of PDG is certainly a departure (as another poster has already indicated)from the confident stance that PDG initially took, that they were 100% sure of their position. And isn't interesting that in their news release they still claim to be, well to me it certainly does not look like the actions of a company very confident in the outcome to halt work at Las Christinas. But then again they never did have title to the concession, something they conveniently avoided addressing. Ward, I would be just alittle nervous right now. IMHO it is not too difficult to read between the lines in the PDG release. Regards