SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: George Papadopoulos who wrote (19735)1/20/1998 9:05:00 PM
From: George Papadopoulos  Respond to of 42771
 
Lan Times January 19.1998 issue

lantimes.com

Last week they blast Moab, now the editor blasts Microsoft....!!!

When integration
disintegrates

By Scott Raynovich

he recent legal battle between Microsoft Corp. and the
U.S. Department of Justice centers around the English
language, not computer code.

It comes down to specific language in the 1994 Consent
Decree, a signed agreement that Microsoft reached with the
department that governs its business practices. The Consent
Decree says that Microsoft cannot force OEMs to bundle
Microsoft products, but it also gives the company the right
to continue to develop "integrated products."

This clause is central to the debate that is now raging.
Microsoft says the clause clearly gives it the right to bundle
Internet Explorer (IE) and Windows 95 as an "integrated"
unit, and ultimately ship both products as part of Windows
98.

The Department of Justice claims Microsoft isn't really
developing a new integrated product at all, but that it is
merely marketing and packaging, or "bundling," two older
products together as one--a big no-no according to the
consent decree.

What does this mean for the users and IS managers who
use Microsoft products? For one, it points out what users
have already known for a long time: The term integration
means different things to different people.

I've tried IE as the integrated browser with Windows 95,
and it's about as integrated as pre-Mandela South Africa.
I've wasted hours attempting to get my system back to
where it was before the "integrated" IE was installed. If
Microsoft defines integrated as 'something that really screws
up your system,' then it's done a good job of integration.

Maybe Microsoft should consider a more user-friendly,
componentized approach to the problem. What's wrong
with supplying IE as a separate component, one that is easy
for OEMs or customers to add or remove? It's being
offered free of charge anyway, and despite Microsoft's
claims that IE cannot be technologically separated from
Windows, the company has shown an eagerness to supply
online upgrades that can be added as needed. Goliath
"integrated" products aren't as compelling as they once
were, especially in the networked world.

The truth is, IS managers are looking to use Windows 98 to
fix Windows 95's problems, not add new ones.

I already know what Microsoft would say, both in public
and in private, about this proposal. In public, officials from
the company would say that it shouldn't have to make IE
and Windows 95 more componentized just because the
U.S. government tells them to.

In private, Microsoft officials would say that letting users
easily remove IE--or add it separately--limits the strategic
leverage they hold with a majority share of the desktop OS
market.

You would think the company that regularly touts advanced
object technology and claims to be moving toward
something called Distributed interNet Applications
Architecture (DNA) would be eager to find a way to
componentize IE and Windows so they could be easily
coupled or separated.

Instead, Microsoft is out to prove what everybody knew all
along: It's less interested in innovation than it is in preserving
the potent political architecture of the most dominant
operating system in the world.



To: George Papadopoulos who wrote (19735)1/20/1998 9:09:00 PM
From: George Papadopoulos  Respond to of 42771
 
Lan Times Jan 19,1998 issue

lantimes.com

Novonyx mired in
parents' politics

Company formed by Netscape and Novell launches
first products, but mixed agendas create conflict

By Susan L. Thomas

s Novonyx Inc. earlier this month prepared to ship
versions of Netscape Communication Corp.'s World
Wide Web-server products for the Novell Inc. NetWare
platform, changes in the corporate control of the company
were already under way.

The shipment of these products was expected to help its
co-founders--Novell and Netscape--compete with
Microsoft Corp., but the awkward and competitive nature
of this partnership was leading Novonyx down a path of
conflict, according to industry observers.

Novonyx officials earlier this month said that management
changes were under way at the company but could not
release any details at press time.

An E-mail purportedly signed by "Novonyx employees"
sent to LAN Times last week said that Novonyx CEO Rob
Hicks had been replaced and that Novell was seeking full
control of the company.

Although Novonyx officials would not confirm that
Novonyx CEO Rob Hicks was being replaced and that
Novell was seeking increased control of the company,
Novonyx officials advised LAN Times not to publish an
interview with Hicks that had been conducted last month.
Hicks, reached at home last week, said that he had been
placed under a gag order.

Novonyx was scheduled to ship three of Netscape's eight
server products this week--the Enterprise Server,
FastTrack Server, and Messaging Server--all of which
Novonyx has ported to NetWare. Novonyx boasts about
50 employees and partnership agreements with several
companies including database giant Oracle Corp.

Indeed, both Netscape and Novell founded Novonyx with
high hopes. But analysts and users agree that the fledgling
company faces significant challenges in its quest to help both
Netscape and Novell combat Microsoft by cultivating
NetWare's viability as a Web applications platform.

Observers expected Novonyx to first take advantage of
both the Novell and the Netscape distribution channels and
build up reseller support of its own channels. Because
Novonyx has developed its products to be compatible with
NetWare 4.x, it also must move intractable NetWare 3.x
customers to higher versions of the NOS, a task with which
Novell has long struggled.

Analyst Tim Sloane at Aberdeen Group Inc., a consultancy
in Boston, said that Novonyx was making a mistake by
ignoring the NetWare 3.0 installed base, which he said
represents a large proportion of NetWare users. Whether
Novonyx can coerce Novell customers into upgrading
depends largely on whether or not Novonyx can develop a
rich applications environment, Sloane said. Without
development, customers will consider a move to Microsoft
Windows NT, he added.

Competition or cooperation?
In forming Novonyx, Novell looked to the company to
make its platform a more competitive development
environment, while Netscape was looking to Novonyx to
take a more evangelical role, spreading the range of
influence of its application-server products. For example,
Netscape users, as well as Novonyx itself, could benefit
from NDS (Novell Directory Services) and its Lightweight
Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) support, which would
let them manage their intranets with one directory.

One VAR and Novonyx beta tester sees demand for
applications developed for NetWare. NetWare customers
think they have to look to NT for Web applications, said
Nathan Durland, a senior engineer at Office Systems in
Plattsburgh, N.Y. Novonyx servers, he said, can solve
many companies' problems.

Developers who have been creating applications for
Netscape SuiteSpot servers are looking to use Novonyx
products on the NetWare platform to expand their markets.
CSG Interactive LLC, an applications developer in Tustin,
Calif., expects it will release business applications for
Novonyx servers in the first half of this year.

"It finally brings Novell up to speed as far as application[s]
development," said CSG President Paul Boyce of the
Novonyx servers. "It's a really complete solution for the first
time."

Such issues may have led Novell to take a greater interest in
Novonyx.

If Novonyx can establish itself by attracting the huge base of
static NetWare users to its products, then it will prove
successful, said Ron Rappaport, an analyst at Zona
Research Inc. in Redwood City, Calif.

Novonyx and Novell were negotiating a deal to bundle one
of the Novonyx Web servers with the upcoming NetWare
5.0 platform, due in the middle of the year. Novell has its
own bare-bones Web server that officials insist is here to
stay. Nevertheless, the agreement may illustrate the conflict
that at least one industry onlooker warned could hinder
Novonyx.

By choosing to make the newer versions of NetWare better
Internet development environments, Novonyx is competing
head-on with Novell, which could "cut Novonyx off at the
ankles," according to Aberdeen Group's Sloane. If Novell
duplicates services for the Web server, for example,
Novonyx will be left with no way to market its products in
the future, he said.

Adding value to Netscape's servers and providing
Web-based services remains a key strategy for Novonyx.

Still, the competition between Novonyx and its
co-founders--as well as the competition between Netscape
and Novell--has been recognized by all of them. Both
Novell and Netscape have mail and groupware products,
directories, and Sun Microsystems Inc. Java development
efforts under way. Novonyx has already decided to go with
Netscape's Messaging Server and Novell's directory.
Novonyx executives said there's enough growth in the
messaging and directory services market for both options to
thrive.

But the politics have been complex and far-reaching. For
example, Novonyx was deciding between the Novell or
Netscape Java Virtual Machine (JVM).

Whether the competition was cooperative or
uncooperative, Novonyx officials were planning to move
beyond porting Netscape's products to the NetWare
environment.

"Our long-term goals are to supply standards-based servers
to [low-end] platforms, and that may encompass more than
just Netscape's servers and the other standards-based
servers that we feel have relevance for our target market,"
said Novonyx' Hicks in a December interview, adding that
Novonyx's target market more closely mirrors Novell's than
Netscape's.

Novonyx plans to roll out the remainder of the Netscape
servers by the end of the year. Netscape's Calendar,
Collabra and Proxy servers are scheduled to ship by
midyear, followed by the Certificate and Compass servers
by the end of 1998.

Novonyx officials have an optimistic outlook for the next
year. Officials said that by the end of 1998 they expect the
company to have more than 90 employees as well as more
than 1,000 business partners of its own, not including its
partnerships with Novell and Netscape resellers.

For more information, contact Novonyx at 888-668-6699,
novonyx.com; Novell at 800-385-7135,
novell.com; and Netscape at 415-937-2555, or
netscape.com.