SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1134624)5/13/2019 2:03:25 PM
From: Tenchusatsu3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Broken_Clock
locogringo
majaman1978

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577883
 
Wharfie,
"Whistleblower "... the person who stole the info; also a criminal for stealing it.
And once again, Wharfie's standards change depending on who's in charge.

If it weren't for double-standards, liberals would have no standards.

Tenchusatsu



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1134624)5/13/2019 2:07:18 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577883
 
and what crime would that be?

meanwhile, where is your outrage over the endemic corruption in SF politics?



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1134624)5/13/2019 3:04:24 PM
From: mel221  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577883
 
>> This reporter, as I understand it, received stolen info, not a crime

So, the reporter acts like a pawn shop trafficking in stolen goods. Like the pawn shop, the reporter and its organization profit from the stolen goods and uses those profits to pay off the thief.

A real good business model for liberals.

Is it a crime for a pawn shop to knowingly receive stolen goods in the Republic of California?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News