SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (148542)5/14/2019 11:00:20 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 217556
 
I think you are mistaken

trump is counted on to be successful as he defined success

in the meantime Pepe seems to get a sense of what might be going on, almost as if he participates on this cafe thread

zerohedge.com

Pepe Escobar Warns Over US-China Tensions: "The Hardcore Is Yet To Come" Authored by Pepe Escobar via The Asia Times,

The Trump administration’s response to China’s emergence has been to throw all sorts of spanners in the works, but tariffs won’t bring back manufacturing jobs...



Let’s start with the “long” 16th Century – which, as with the 21st, also saw a turbulent process of marketization. At that time, the Jesuits and the Counter-Reformation were trying to rebound across Asia – but within a context where the rivalry between the Iberian superpowers of the age, Spain and Portugal, still lingered.

The Reformation first attached itself to the Dutch trade thalassocracy – a seaborne empire, under which commerce was paramount – over strict propaganda of religious dogma. Britain’s maritime realm was still biding its time. The emergence of Protestantism proceeded in parallel to the emergence of neo-Confucianism in East Asia.

Fast forward to our turbulent times. Marketization – renamed as globalization – seems to be in crisis. But not in the Middle Kingdom, which is now investing in globalization 2.0 amid increasing rivalry with the other superpower, the US.

The American thalassocracy is being superseded by the Revenge of the Heartland, in the form of the Russia-China strategic partnership – for whom Eurasian trade integration, as expressed by the New Silk Roads, or Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is paramount over the Make America Great Again (MAGA) dogma.

Meanwhile, the re-emergence of Right populism in the West mirrors the re-emergence of pragmatic neo-Confucianism across Asia.

BRI – the prime vehicle for Eurasia integration – would have never come to light without China’s four decades of breakneck economic development.

My sharpest and most informed geopolitical readers, such as the wonderfully enigmatic Larchmonter, are in synch with my running conversations – for years now – with top analysts in Russia, China, Iran, Turkey and Pakistan; following the Obama administration’s fuzzy “pivot to Asia”, the Trump administration’s response to China’s emergence has been to throw all sorts of spanners in the works.

Thus, the current hysteria over tariffs, the trade offensive, the demonization of BRI, Made in China 2025 and Huawei’s 5G dominance, and all manner of disruptive Hybrid War tactics such as repeatedly claiming “freedom of navigation” in the South China Sea to progressive weaponizing of Taiwan.

All that duly fueled by non-stop hatchet jobs on media outlets, as in branding Huawei as “suspect” or “permanently untrustworthy”.

From the point of view of the hyperpower, there can be only one possible endgame: an amputated, permanently crippled and preferably non-stop aching Chinese economy – with unfavorable demographics to boot.



Soybeans from Ukraine are unloaded at the port in Nantong, in eastern China. Imports of soy used to come from the US, but have slumped since the trade war began. Photo: AFP

Where are our jobs?Pause on the sound and fury for necessary precision. Even if the Trump administration slaps 25% tariffs on all Chinese exports to the US, the IMF has projected that would trim just a meager slither – 0.55% – off China’s GDP. And America is unlikely to profit, because the extra tariffs won’t bring back manufacturing jobs to the US – something that Steve Jobs told Barack Obama eons ago.

What happens is that global supply chains will be redirected to economies that offer comparative advantages in relation to China, such as Vietnam, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Cambodia and Laos. And this redirection is already happening anyway – including by Chinese companies.

BRI represents a massive geopolitical and financial investment by China, as well as its partners; over 130 states and territories have signed on. Beijing is using its immense pool of capital to make its own transition towards a consumer-based economy while advancing the necessary pan-Eurasian infrastructure development – with all those ports, high-speed rail, fiber optics, electrical grids expanding to most Global South latitudes.

The end result, up to 2049 – BRI’s time span – will be the advent of an integrated market of no less than 4.5 billion people, by that time with access to a Chinese supply chain of high-tech exports as well as more prosaic consumer goods.

Anyone who has followed the nuts and bolts of the Chinese miracle launched by Little Helmsman Deng Xiaoping in 1978 knows that Beijing is essentially exporting the mechanism that led China’s own 800 million citizens to, in a flash, become members of a global middle class.

As much as the Trump administration may bet on “maximum pressure” to restrict or even block Chinese access to whole sectors of the US market, what really matters is BRI’s advance will be able to generate multiple, extra US markets over the next two decades.

We don’t do ‘win-win’There are no illusions in the Zhongnanhai, as there are no illusions in Tehran or in the Kremlin. These three top actors of Eurasian integration have exhaustively studied how Washington, in the 1990s, devastated Russia’s post-USSR economy (until Putin engineered a recovery) and how Washington has been trying to utterly destroy Iran for four decades.

Beijing, as well as Moscow and Tehran, know everything there is to know about Hybrid War, which is an American intel concept. They know the ultimate strategic target of Hybrid War, whatever the tactics, is social chaos and regime change.

The case of Brazil – a BRICS member like China and Russia – was even more sophisticated: a Hybrid War initially crafted by NSA spying evolved into lawfare and regime change via the ballot box. But it ended with mission accomplished – Brazil has been reduced to the lowly status of an American neo-colony.

Let’s remember an ancient mariner, the legendary Chinese Muslim Admiral Zheng He, who for three decades, from 1405 to 1433, led seven expeditions across the seas all the way to Arabia and Eastern Africa, reaching Champa, Borneo, Java, Malacca, Sumatra, Ceylon, Calicut, Hormuz, Aden, Jeddah, Mogadiscio, Mombasa, bringing tons of goods to trade (silk, porcelain, silver, cotton, iron tools, leather utensils).

That was the original Maritime Silk Road, progressing in parallel to Emperor Yong Le establishing a Pax Sinica in Asia – with no need for colonies and religious proselytism. But then the Ming dynasty retreated – and China was back to its agricultural vocation of looking at itself.

They won’t make the same mistake again. Even knowing that the current hegemon does not do “win-win”. Get ready for the real hardcore yet to come.




To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (148542)5/14/2019 11:18:17 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217556
 
might just be that the 2020 election shall be decided between teams Russia and China, as long as both figure out how best to help trump get reelected



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (148542)5/14/2019 11:47:30 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217556
 
hmmnnnn

your very post is telling ... about your psyche

you wish to vote for the trump but cannot bring yourself to admit it, because you lost to trump supporters. an inconvenient problem.

I remain open-minded about the trump, and shall remain so. in the mean time I do acknowledge that the trump won, fair and square and if anything against unfair and unsquare. time shall tell.

re <<Americans do see the war-mongering Chinese Deep State for what it is and how contrary their goals are to our interests and the interests of our young people.>>

do Americans see anything else? and all forgot who started the trade war? how forgetful. is free trade not about trade by volition?

and btw, does it matter what the world sees?

edition.cnn.com

Trump to world: 'You're tariffed!'

(CNN) — Who isn't President Donald Trump targeting with a trade war? China is the front line, clearly. But he's played tough with Mexico, Canada, the European Union and even India. Japan, the world's third largest economy, has evaded his ire, but Tokyo also hasn't yet agreed a trade deal with the US.

He's emboldened by an incredibly resilient US economy he claims as valediction. The newest tariffs he's imposed on Chinese goods are not a drag on US consumers, but rather in the service of a better bargaining position for a trade deal, which he'll deliver at some point, he hopes. The trade war with China is "a little squabble."

Trump's reality with regard to China, which he explained to reporters at the White House Tuesday, might be more believable if China were the only nation with which Trump was tangling. Far from it.

Nothing happens in a vacuum. While China has already raised tariffs on US exports. Mexico is preparing to retaliate against US tariffs and the EU is said to be weighing its options.
Trump's trade war is bigger than China; it's a multi-front world conflagration in which Trump is the aggressor, picking fights with world leaders and the US Congress as he foists his nationalism onto the rest of the world, sending shock waves through the global economy.

Trump's aggressive moves have US clothing companies "freaked." Farmers hurt by the trade war are looking for another multi-billion dollar aid payout from taxpayers, automobile manufacturers are anxiously awaiting separate tariffs Trump is considering. Even the price of tomatoes is set to skyrocket thanks to Trump.

On notice: "You will be tariffed"

Trump's moves emerge from his messaging. The US might be largest and most powerful economy in the world, but it's been pushed around, according to Trump.

"We are the piggy bank that everybody likes to take advantage of or take from and we can't let that happen anymore," he said in a riff on the idea Tuesday.

Never mind that piggy bank analogies in US politics are usually employed to raise the alarm about the $22 trillion national debt, which is exploding as a result of Trump's cuts and the largest single foreign owner of which (more than $1.3 trillion) is China.

The idea that Trump is fighting for trade justice is central to his world view and the idea that all of his predecessors did it wrong is a main theme, although he'll often temper that sense of injustice with boasts about how well things are going.

"I think we probably have the greatest economy that we've ever had," he said Tuesday.

Second, Trump would like you to know that despite what you read in the media about tariffs and counter-tariffs, what's going on with China is not a trade war, but rather "a little squabble," as he said Tuesday. And the US is "in a very strong position."

Third, if you don't treat the US fairly, in Trump's mind, you "will be tariffed."

Trump seemed to be trying to start a new catchphrase last September when he defended tariffs (read: taxes) he was slapping on imports.



Donald J. Trump

?@realDonaldTrump





Tariffs have put the U.S. in a very strong bargaining position, with Billions of Dollars, and Jobs, flowing into our Country - and yet cost increases have thus far been almost unnoticeable. If countries will not make fair deals with us, they will be “Tariffed!”

"They will be 'Tariffed!" he said of countries he didn't think were treating the US fairly.

It was like a "You're fired!" for his brand of dramatic, confrontational nationalist global trade. A week later he hit China with new tariffs on $200 billion worth of goods. What he's done most recently is raise the rate of the tariffs on those goods from 10% to 25%.

Penalties for top trading partners

China retaliates with higher tariffs on US goods 01:49

The top three US trading partners are Mexico, Canada and China, in that order. Together they represent 43% of US trade with other countries, according to Census data.
Trump has hit all three with tariffs of some kind, yet he's failed so far to agree new trade deals. He could be running out of things to threaten.

Trump hit China with tariffs last year and threatened more if a deal could not be reached by March. He extended that deadline in February. But now with trade talks stalled, he's carrying through with increased tariffs on $200 billion in goods from China and considering tariffs on an additional $300 billion in goods -- essentially everything else China sells to the US.
That's not he only deadline coming. May 18 marks the deadline for Trump to respond to a report he requested on possible tariffs on auto imports from Mexico and the European Union, although there is expectation from the auto industry and Europe that he will seek to delay that decision.
"There are signals that it could be extended - because of the negotiations between the US and China," European Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstroem told a German newspaper.
Trump could use the threat of those tariffs in trade negotiations with the EU, although those talks have barely gotten off the ground.
The possibility of auto tariffs would also present problems for Mexico, where US car manufacturers have opened plants. Mexico also exports large amounts of produce to the US.

Not all tariffs are tied to trade deals. The Commerce Department, responding to complaints from Florida growers, according to NPR, re-imposed duties on Mexican tomatoes, which amounts to a tariff since it could drive up the cost of produce in US markets. Mexico produces a large portion of the tomatoes consumed in the US and a 2013 deal had forestalled those duties.

Pushing "non-Tariffed" alternatives

President & CEO 'beyond freaked' over China tariff hikes 01:56

Now that trade talks with China are stalled, markets are spooked, and US farmers and retailers are, in the words of Rick Helfenbein, president of the American Apparel and Footwear Association, "beyond freaked."

No matter, Trump said Sunday on Twitter.

"We are right where we want to be with China. Remember, they broke the deal with us & tried to renegotiate. We will be taking in Tens of Billions of Dollars in Tariffs from China. Buyers of product can make it themselves in the USA (ideal), or buy it from non-Tariffed countries..."

He specifically mentioned Vietnam, a signatory of the TPP he scuttled for the US, but which other countries carried on. But the larger point is that unilateral trade deals and a tough foreign policy were supposed to bring businesses home to the US, not send them to different countries in Asia.

To be sure, all of this could work out and Trump could emerge from his presidency with separate new trade deals for China, the EU and North America. It would be a triumph of tariffs over trade and create a new reality.

Trump against the world

Tariffs could cost American family of four $767 per year 02:45

His presidency has been spent projecting dominance, issuing threats, demanding concessions and slapping tariffs on the United States' largest trading partners.

What he's technically got to show for it, so far, is a trade deal with South Korea, which had the backdrop of North Korea and possible nuclear annihilation to move it along.
His promised re-branding and update of NAFTA -- Trump wants to call it the US, Mexico, Canada trade agreement or USMCA -- is foundering in part because the White House failed to get the deal ratified before Democrats took control of the House in January.

"The problem is that they kicked the can down the road. They were being hostile toward the Canadians and the Mexicans alike. And the deal got signed late," former US Ambassador to Canada Bruce Heyman told Yahoo! Finance.
The issue of a hostile Congress could also make it difficult for Trump to get another multi-billion handout for US farmers hurting because of the trade war his tariffs have caused.
Trump should have known the importance of speed. Among his first acts as President was to officially kill the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a delicately negotiated 11-country trade deal joined by the Obama administration but never acted upon by Congress. It was meant to create a counterweight to the influence of China in the region.

The other countries in the Pacific have carried on without the US. Trump promised to seek unilateral deals and he's done so not with carrots, but with sticks and tariffs.

What he lacks in clear strategy he has made up for with consistency, so far.