SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications-News Only!!! (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lin huan chen who wrote (990)1/21/1998 9:00:00 AM
From: Gary Korn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1629
 
(COMTEX) VENDORS ARE BULLISH ON ATM'S PROSPECTS FOR 1998
VENDORS ARE BULLISH ON ATM'S PROSPECTS FOR 1998

Jan 20, 1998 (BROADBAND NETWORKING NEWS, Vol. 8, No. 2) -- ATM
equipment vendors tend to be an optimistic bunch. In a way they need
to be, choosing as they do to ignore ATM's oft-published obituaries in
the trade press and at trade shows. The ATM equipment vendors
interviewed by the editors of BROADBAND NETWORKING NEWS proved
positively upbeat. Many are predicting that ATM will not only flourish
in 1998, but it will finally "turn the curve" towards widespread
adoption.

ATM vendors are not the only ones bearing good news. Vertical
Systems ratcheted its projections upward in the recent ATM And Frame
Relay Industry Update. For example, one year ago Vertical Systems
predicted a worldwide market of $1.6 billion for combined ATM equipment
and services. Today, it reports 1997 was in fact a $2.2 billion year,
or about 41 percent better than expectations. And, most of this
improvement fell in the equipment sales column, perhaps explaining the
confident attitude of ATM equipment vendors.
ATM still has far to go. Revenue from ATM services remain at a
fraction of revenue from equipment sales, an exact opposite of the
booming frame relay services market where services are a majority of
revenue. The total worldwide combined market for ATM will be $7.2
billion in 2000, or about one-half that of the projected frame relay
market, according to Vertical Systems.

It is certainly well-known that ATM has been accepted as a scaleable
network backbone, and it has benefited from the explosive growth of the
World Wide Web and increased use of Internet Protocol (IP). "ATM is
alive and well in backbone," says Roger Krall, director of ATM
marketing at General DataCom [GDC]. "With the adoption of IP as a
predominant LAN protocol, we see a large requirement for ATM equipment
to provide transport for IP protocol. This is certainly an area of
significant growth," he adds.

Cruising slightly below the radar screens of many industry watchers,
however, is a big surprise - the increased use of ATM in local-area
networks, albeit, very large local-area networks.

"ATM is going mainstream. ATM is now a safe, proven choice for the
enterprise backbone," claims Dave Nelsen, senior director for business
planning at FORE Systems [FORE]. A number of companies have migrated
their large Ethernet-based LANs to ATM backbones in the past year, he
says.

"The names of companies installing ATM backbones are names you know
well: Shell Oil or Hewlett-Packard [HWP]. These are mainstream
companies. One of the most impressive is Microsoft Corp. [MSFT]. It
has moved its entire corporate backbone to ATM. If anyone knows what's
coming down pike in terms of applications the network will need to
support, it's Microsoft," he says.

Nelsen explains that FORE's customers are looking at ATM as a
technology that will scale and remain viable for a long period of time.
"The standards are solid and stable. I can now go to ATM and count on
it to be a strategic advantage to my company," he adds.

One factor that is helping the acceptance of ATM is the emergence of
real applications where ATM is arguably the best, or even only, choice
for transport. "I'd say the educational vertical market continues to
be an excellent area of growth in ATM," says Houman Modarres, director
of ATM product management at Newbridge Networks [NN] and the vice
chairman of the ATM Forum's market awareness committee.

Modarres explains that education is a good area for ATM services
"because it allows for capabilities of not only video , but
also tying together the networks of schools. In other words, tying the
PBXs together, and libraries, including the local community libraries,
[into] a civic network."

Computer/telephony integration (CTI) is an emerging application that
promises to push ATM all the way to the user desktop, says FORE's
Nelsen. "Computer telephony allows a company to use one single ATM
infrastructure as a data network and get a voice network for free,
because it is integrated with the computers and servers," he says.

Unlike the trend of ATM backbones for corporate LANs, which is mainly
an activity within mammoth corporations, CTI-inspired ATM is taking
place in the smalls. "The companies leading the charge here tend to be
operations, or branch offices, that are perhaps 100 people or less,"
Nelsen adds.
Ironically, however, the best salesman for ATM equipment is the rapid
growth of frame relay services. "Frame relay will continue to be
biggest driver for ATM. More and more the frame relay networks are
looking to ATM for the higher speed backbone trunking," says Mark
Kaplan, senior product marketing manager for frame relay at Newbridge
Networks.

"I'm not sure what the time frame is, but maybe five years from now
we'll see technologies like frame relay and X.25 exist to a great
degree as access technologies and pricing points onto an ATM backbone,"
he predicts.

"The customer doesn't really care. It wants traffic going from point
A to point B cheaper and faster than ever before. If you choose to
call that service frame relay to price differ-entiate it from your ATM
service, then fine," adds Kaplan.

"Frame relay and ATM are becoming less distinct, and in fact very
much a continuum," agrees Tony Rybczynski, director strategic
technologies at Nortel [NT]. "To a large extent the carriers are
deploying frame relay as a [user network interface] into an ATM
backbone."

...Back to the Beginning

"What we are seeing is that ATM has gone almost full circle," says
Jeff Kiel, manager, product marketing for Ascend Communications' [ASND]
core systems division. "ATM was originally developed as an internal
network tool, and a single network infrastructure. There was a time
when there was a lot of excitement about applications for ATM - ATM to
the home, ATM to the desktop. But, it has come back full circle to a
high-speed multiservice, multiuser core for networks."

"The concept of [ATM] originally was to create a common transport
that has telco-like capabilities, in that it was deterministic and able
to set up different types of services," says Craig Johnson, principal
analyst at Dataquest. "Conceptually, ATM was a major shift. It's just
been a long time from conception to quasi reality." (Contact: Ascend,
508/692-2600; Dataquest, 503/287-7542; FORE, 412/742-4444; GDC,
203/574-1118; Newbridge, 703/736-5791; Nortel, 613/723-49200)

ATM Revenue Forecast - Worldwide
($ Millions) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Services 103.3 242.4 478.9 914.7 1,604.6
Equipment 1,096.0 1,962.6 2,994.2 4,252.6 5,663.1
Totals 1,199.3 2,205.0 3,473.1 5,167.3 7,267.7
Source: Vertical Systems Group
ATM Revenue Forecast - U.S. Market
($ Millions) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Services 79.8 183.5 349.0 623.9 964.9
Equipment 585.4 986.6 1,422.9 1,920.7 2,435.4
Totals 665.2 1,170.1 1,771.9 2,544.6 3,400.3
Source: Vertical Systems Group




To: lin huan chen who wrote (990)1/21/1998 9:04:00 AM
From: Gary Korn  Respond to of 1629
 
1/20/98 Broadband Networking News (Pg. Unavail. Online)
1998 WL 8038593
Broadband Networking News
(c) 1998 Phillips Business Information, Inc.

Tuesday, January 20, 1998

Vol. 8, Issue: 2

WILLIAMS REENTERS TRANSPORT MARKET WITH ASCEND ATM CORE

Three years after it abandoned the wholesale data transport
market with a $2.5 billion sale of its data unit to WorldCom [WCOM],
Williams Communications [WMB] is planning a comeback. Its re-entry
into the market coincides with the all-important expiration date of
its noncompete agreement with WorldCom, and the plans are cemented by
the revelation of some $1 billion worth of long-term customer
agreements. These include a nationwide, "anchor tenant" deal with U S
West [USW] and a $260 million dollar deal with InterMedia
Communications Inc. [ICIX].

Williams is embracing an ATM and SONET strategy to handle
multiple protocols on a nation-wide network. This strategy includes a
network equipment upgrade of $150 million worth of ATM, frame relay,
and network management products from Ascend Communications [ASND].

Included on the shopping list is Ascend's recently announced GX
550 ATM core switch. (See BNN, October 14, 1997.) Williams is also
purchasing the CBX 500 multiservice ATM and B-STDX 9000 multiservice
frame relay switches. Along with other ATM and frame relay switches,
the platforms will support more than two million connections, over 10
million cell buffers, and data rates from less than DS-0 to OC-48 (2.5
Gbps).

Although Williams recently signed up for $300 million worth of
Nortel [NT] SONET transmission equipment in September, the company
went with Ascend for the ATM core switches. "We try to deploy the
best technology available today for each piece of our network,"
explains Howard Janzen, president and chief executive officer of
Williams' communications group.

...The Low-Cost Player

Williams will offer capacity for half the cost of legacy players
for comparable services. "We're building a network that operates at
the lowest cost point," Janzen says. He explains that Williams will
operate its network for less money and underprice WorldCom because
WorldCom is stuck with an antiquated legacy network, adding that
selling the network to WorldCom allowed Williams to move forward with
new technology on the infrastructure it had kept.

"The carriers are building what we call the 'new' public
network," says Jeff Kiel, manager of product marketing for Ascend's
Core Systems Division. "A lot of data networks are modeled after
voice networks. The end result is that these infrastructures are
really being strained. The carriers need to build a new network that
is optimized for data transport.

"Williams is a classic example of someone building a new public
network," he adds. "This is an information transport-focused network
[with quality of service], multiuser, and multiservices using ATM at
the core."

The decision by Williams to go with an ATM backbone to carry
what will be primarily IP traffic highlights one of the debates
shaping up for 1998 - the best strategy to carry IP, ATM, and SONET
traffic on one network.

Qwest, for example, is working with Cisco Systems [CSCO] and
counting on IP equipment advances to usher in an all-IP network to
carry all multimedia services. "The whole world is moving toward IP,"
says Nayel Shafei, Qwest's executive vice president, data products.
Although he acknowledges that IP routers can't keep up with OC-192
(9.95 Gbps) SONET equipment, he predicts major advancements in routing
rates this year.

"The whole world has discovered that ATM is not for the
backbone," Shafei says. He dismisses ATM as an attempt to resurrect
circuit switching and characterizes major ATM deployments as "the last
gasp of a dinosaur."

"We believe there will be significant movement to IP traffic,"
says Gordon Martin, vice president of sales and marketing for Williams

Network. "But there is also voice, data, and video traffic that can
run on high-end ATM." He concludes that "we would not articulate a
pure IP or ATM strategy," but instead would enable both with the most
efficient technology available.

"The revenue generating potential of ATM is better than double
that of IP," claims Tom Nolle, president of consulting firm CIMI Corp.
Bucking astronomical IP traffic projections, he says that as margins
on voice services fall, some 80 percent of carrier profit potential
will come from IP applications, while IP traffic makes up 40 percent
of network traffic. He sees Williams' use of ATM as a validation of
ATM's ability to balance the revenue/traffic equation.

"There are some carriers who are concerned about the cell tax,
while there are other carriers who are not as concerned because they
view there is value that IP over ATM brings that they do not have with
IP over SONET or IP over PPP," says Ascend's Kiel. "The bandwidth
management, and management in general of the networks far outweighs
any penalty in the cell tax." (Contact: Ascend Communications,
508/692-2600; Williams, 918/588-4740; CIMI, 609/753-0004; Quest,
303/291-1662)

---- INDEX REFERENCES ----

COMPANY (TICKER): Intermedia Communications Inc.; Ascend Communications Inc.; Northern Telecom Ltd.; BCE Inc.; Northern Telecom Ltd. (ICIX ASND NT BCE T.NTL)

NEWS SUBJECT: High-Yield Issuers; World Equity Index (HIY WEI)

INDUSTRY: Mobile Communication Systems; Telephone Systems; Telecommunications, All; Communications Technology (CTS TLS TEL CMT)

Word Count: 767
1/20/98 BRDBNN (No Page)
END



To: lin huan chen who wrote (990)1/21/1998 8:20:00 PM
From: Maverick  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1629
 
Gerard Klauer upped its rating on Ascendto buy from hold and set a 12-mo target of 44.



To: lin huan chen who wrote (990)1/26/1998 5:59:00 PM
From: Maverick  Respond to of 1629
 
A Actually, in the case of telephony, no, and that's the beauty of it. Voice
does not consume very much bandwidth. So today if you have a 56
kilobytes-per-second- analog line to your home, you could still have
adequate data performance and at the same time have a voice conversation of
the same quality as you have today with the voice circuits.

Q So what would ISPs need to offer that service?

A They need to add, basically, what amounts to a codec
(compression-decompression) function. That essentially moves transformed
voice into bits, and they need to upgrade the software for that platform to be
able to know what to do with these bits once you've created them so you know
how to send them across the (Internet) backbone.

And I expect that very soon this will become table stakes. In other words, if
you want to be in ISP, if you want to be one of the 200 to 300 ISPs that
survives, in that we have 4,000 to 5,000 today, you're going to have to have a
richer collection of services. You're going to have to do more than just plain,
low quality, 1995 ''all you can eat'' data service.

Q Why do we even need 200 to 300 ISPs? Don't we need, really, about the
same number of phone companies we have?

A We may actually end up having fewer than 100 ISPs when all is said and
done, but I think it depends upon how far into the future you project. There is
probably more opportunity for differentiation and, therefore, to justify their
existence in the ISP world than in the telephone world.

Q If you had to make a guess, how many years would it take to get to as few
as 100 ISPs?

A It will probably take us four to five years, which, if you compare this to the
telephony industry and how long it takes for these things to happen there, it's
actually remarkably fast.