SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jamie153 who wrote (126865)5/24/2019 10:16:40 AM
From: Winfastorlose1 Recommendation

Recommended By
toccodolce

  Respond to of 206796
 
Te US doesn't have 5G? LOL. You are very naive. The technology comes from the US. The US just no longer has a pure backbone builder. But that can easily be remedied. Huawei has been stealing US technology for years. That is what this is all about. IP. For a while, it was allowed. But no more.



To: Jamie153 who wrote (126865)5/24/2019 10:23:13 AM
From: SGJ2 Recommendations

Recommended By
berniel
toccodolce

  Respond to of 206796
 
The Huawei problem is Chinese spying. If 5G comes with a Communist dictatorship bent on world domination spying on our govt and its citizens, I can wait. But I don't have to, my area already has 5G.



To: Jamie153 who wrote (126865)5/24/2019 11:54:29 AM
From: TigerPaw2 Recommendations

Recommended By
marcher
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 206796
 
This trade war is about one thing and only one thing. 5G.


I think the correct historical analog for today's situation is the development of high pressure steam engines in the period of 1800-1820. In those days England was the undisputed industrial leader of the world, and they still resented the United States for breaking away as a colony thirty years earlier even though they kept most economic ties. In 1812 England got it's military revenge by kicking the US butt in another war, burning the capital, reasserting their economic interest in Canada. There were also new tariffs from each party. The US responded by ignoring English patents, especially to high pressure steam which England had invented, and began to develop an indigenous industry based on coal and steel, centered in New England states which had the greater contact with English industry and an easier time stealing technology. By 1830 the US could build high pressure steam engines small enough to fit on a boat, while England was still building mammoth low pressure engines over their coal mines and mills. By 1850 the US was exporting engines, and the whole industrial concept, to emerging markets such as Germany.


Well today the leading industrial power is the US, inventor of 5G.


There does seem to be an idea in this country that with a few tariffs and a sanction or two the Chinese will have no choice but to send their millions of people back to the countryside to raise ducks and tea bushes. I think the days of Mao have passed. If China is forced to complete an indigenous industry on it's own and prop up emerging markets to give it an export base then I think history shows this is not only possible, but probable.