Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A Little Forum For Gold Microclusters -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe Champion who wrote (109)	1/21/1998 12:53:00 AM
From: Chuca Marsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 142

Joe, I know you took 3 days too write this up, but I think you should of atleast refered my one year old multiple posts on Micro Fine Gold Thread concerning our conversations with C.L., Zeev Hed , R.M., Lee Bush and all the old originals about KJM's ( Keith Mc Kensie ) ( of JKMCap.com/Keith @ KJMCAP.com) bringing into the old discussions then of ICPM(Microspectrophy). It appears you left that out as wells as Einsteins Theory of Quantam Physics and the interrelationship to the constants on bended light and the Theory of Realativity. You know, they are all related here to the NEWTECH discussion. But not to comment ona mya Mainea Guya whoa isa losta; unforgivable. Inducted into the Hall of Unforgivmeabreakable! www.unforgivable.com OffadacuffaChuca P.S.-Joea, youa mya Mainea Mana- Youa losta?? Ya canta blacka-whita froma there, heara? Golds herea area GRAYA!

To: Joe Champion who wrote (109)	1/21/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: Michael J. Wendell	Respond to of 142

Joe, Glad to have you join the thread. Thanks for the corrections. You are right that gold in a non-ionized form is not subject to detection by AA or ICP. I have always called ICP Induced Coupled Plasma, I guess I am wrong. But when the gold is recovered on the membrane and acidified with Aqua Regia, the results do report, where they did not initially. Asarco, Phelps Dodge and probably all major mining companies have used slag correction assays. When you do them right, you fire blanks assays without ore but include all of the steps and ingredients that are done with ore. They do produce values because the ingredients are less pure than they are reported to be, but you must measure and weigh those values and then subtract those values from actual slag correction assays with ore that do report higher values than the blanks. The Mints of the world that did ore assays for industry for years accepted this practice. The gold reported to their recovery and porocessing balance methods. I have used the practice at times because it is more reliable than AA or ICP on these DD samples that do not conventionally assay. I accept what I can see and weigh. The trouble with the slag correction method is that it greatly under under reports values for the DD resources when compared to some of the newer processing methods being developed. It is also flawed by its being so inconsistent in producing results, even when repeating with splits of the same sample. I am sure you are aware of that, as I have heard your name before and am aware of your work in the field of DDs. Today for the first time that I know of, these metals are being produced in pounds and are being accepted by large and small refineries. Commercial exploitation and profits from the DDs are just a step away. I believe you believe that too. mike

To: Joe Champion who wrote (109)	1/21/1998 8:12:00 PM
From: Michael J. Wendell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 142

Joe, I see transmutation in your internet address. It would be appreciated if you added some of your views to this thread. I think you have something to offer. What we are trying to do is pass on information to DD investors and researchers so they we can all benefit and be just a little more knowledgeable. We share experiences, comments, opinions and facts. I am very opinionated, but I respect everyones opinions. That might speak for all of us. mike