Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Buckwheat who wrote (3983)	1/21/1998 12:57:00 AM
From: Time Traveler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

Buckwheat, The original question of "How did Intel revenue increase from $20 billion 96 to $25 billion 97 with flat (no incremental) earnings?" does not make any sense. Intel had higher earning in '97 than in '96! Therefore, your answer to that question was a total BS. Sorry to be so frank about it, but you did not get it from my reply, Message 3216081. John.

To: Buckwheat who wrote (3983)	1/21/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Respond to of 6843

Buckwheat - Re: " How did Intel revenue increase from $20 billion 96 to $25 billion 97 with flat (no incremental) earnings? What is your explaination." The simple explanation is that you don't know what you are talking about. Intel had EARNINGS of 5.2 Million Dollars in 1996 and had EARNINGS of 6.9 Billion Dollars for 1997. THAT IS NOT FLAT EARNINGS! It is an increase of 33% over the prior year (1996). Where in the world did you get the idea that Intel's earnings were FLAT for 1997? Anyone can get that information right off the net - Intel's web site for example. Why can't you? Paul