Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Ilchyshn who wrote (6380)	1/21/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Gary	Respond to of 116837

I don't know a news letter writer or an economist who has ever been right 100% of the time. I follow Armstrong along with about 10 other writers an economists and don't defefnd any of them. I find that if I listen to them all and put thier projections into my context then I can draw my own conclusions as I think we all must inevitably do. He just happens to have been the most accurate on gold projection over tha last 2 years. Put them all into perspective McAvity, Yager, Casey,Sarnoff,Coleman,Fagan,Master Indicator,Dines,Bishop, etc.ect. none are ever right 100% ro even 80% . I also find that you must read all of these peoples material as I see comments on the threads being taken out of context .

To: Jim Ilchyshn who wrote (6380)	1/21/1998 1:31:00 PM
From: Mark Bartlett	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116837

Jim, <<I think silver demand will explode as this trend continues. Not to mention the still lacking quality of digital photos. - Jim. (the guy that has lost respect for Shorty I mean Marty Armstrong).>> I am with you here on both counts ..... MA has lost a lot of resepct in my book. The impact of digital on silver use will not be felt for many years IMHO .... presently the impact that digital has had on photography, does not even desrve a footnote ..... hardly a factor. MB