Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A Real American President: Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJB who wrote (137944)	5/31/2019 7:25:14 AM
From: Mrjns	2 Recommendations Recommended By Honey_Bee locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 455175

When the dust settles, libturds will realize that what Mueller said was that "If it was clear Trump was innocent we would have said so". A statement no investigator, attorney, prosecutor, judge or jury would ever make in this country. That's presumption of guilt. And Mollie was on target when she said Mueller may have "pulled a Comey" in reference to the infamous press conference. I am not sure anyone would say that press conference ultimately helped HRC, it totally destroyed any public illusions about her innocence. Soon one would likely be saying the same about the left's illusions about Trump's guilt after the Mueller impeachment statement. Someone asked about all the counts about Obstruction in the Mueller report. There are none. It's all a litany of: "he asked Comey hope he'd see his way clear to let this go" "he asked McGahn" "he asked McGahn to ask Sessions" "asked McGahn to deny he asked" (not making that one up) "tried to have Sessions take over SC" "he thought about firing Mueller" "attempted to influence Flynn, Manafort, Cohen, Stone, Jury etc" "he tweeted" Except for "he tweeted" there's no "did" there. edit: Firing Comey doesn't count, because the investigation was not stopped - he asked for more investigation