Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1138247)	6/1/2019 7:32:04 AM
From: locogringo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576825

If Americans won’t read Mueller’s report, spoon-feed it to them Why? The summary is the same as reading it. NO CHARGES AGAINST PRESIDENT TRUMP. 100% VINDICATED. INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1138247)	6/1/2019 8:29:33 AM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576825

Are you aware that some gruber here actually went around bragging that this piece of work was never disproved? How could anybody be that simpleminded? I bet he believed in PP-tapes and the Moscow Penthouse too. Embarrassing: It Seems Even The British Knew The Trump Dossier Was Trash …in 2017 The Trump dossier was a piece of political opposition research compiled by ex-MI6 spy Christopher Steele. The Democrats and the Clinton campaign bankrolled it. The mission was simple. Find dirt on Donald Trump and he used sources that are still active in the Kremlin. Sounds like Clinton-Russia collusion, but that’s a whole other tale. Even from the beginning of this fiasco, the document’s credibility was suspect. It’s loaded with salacious tales about Trump that are pretty much straight trash in the sense that they’re false at face value. It’s why no other outlet decided to publish the document in full, except BuzzFeed because they have no standards. Original Article

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1138247)	6/1/2019 8:33:07 AM
From: locogringo	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1576825

OOPS! If Democrats want to argue that corrupt intent and an underlying offense are not needed to prove obstruction, then was former President Bill Clinton committing obstruction when he met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch at the Phoenix Airport while the FBI was investigating his wife’s mishandling of government emails? Or was former President Barack Obama committing obstruction when he opined that Hillary Clinton had done nothing wrong with her emails while she was his secretary of state? Both Presidents Obama and Clinton acted before then-FBI Director James Comey announced his recommendation that Hillary Clinton – then running for president against Trump – should not be charged for improperly using a private email server instead of the required secure government email system while heading the State Department. Original Article Karl Rove: Five things that will happen if House Dems move to impeach Trump