Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (1138448)	6/2/2019 8:03:07 PM
From: Jamie153	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573954

Let's begin with the obvious. In order to prove a conspiracy you have to talk to the people who were in the conspiracy. Did Mueller talk to anyone from Russia about a conspiracy? Nope. Did he talk to anyone in Trump campaign, especially Trump and those closest to him about a conspiracy? Nope. Did he have them testify under oath and in front of a grand jury? Nope. If you don't look it's amazing what you can't find. Now, let's review obstruction. In order to prove obstruction we need to know intent. Did Trump know he was committing crimes when he told his lawyer to fire Mueller repeatedly? If his lawyer is a real lawyer he would have told him it was a crime, but since he did it again we have to assume he was a really shitty lawyer and should be disbarred. Btw, he also failed to answer a subpoena so another crime under his belt. As soon as Trump ordered him to break the law he should have walked over to the House and Senate and told them about the crimes Trump wanted him to commit. Ordering someone to commit a crime is a high crime.