SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Real American President: Donald Trump -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Honey_Bee who wrote (138666)6/4/2019 2:24:01 PM
From: FJB2 Recommendations

Recommended By
AJ Muckenfus
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 457312
 
DRUG CARTELS CONTROL 60-80% OF MEXICO'S TERRITORY ACCORDING TO MEXICAN GOVERNMENT. SEE BOTTOM OF ARTICLE...

Power Line

Trump Visits the U.K.
(John Hinderaker) President Trump is in the midst of his visit to the United Kingdom, tweeting as he goes. For example: London part of trip is going really well. The Queen and the entire Royal family have been fantastic. The relationship with the United Kingdom is very strong. Tremendous crowds of well wishers and people that love our Country. Haven’t seen any protests yet, but I’m sure the…. — Do

Family Ties

Power LinePower Lineby Steven Hayward


(Steven Hayward) Really, I don’t understand the left sometimes. They’re very upset at the practice of “family separation” of migrant children at the border (a practice that goes back many years, keep in mind), but then I return to my Communist Manifesto to remind myself that a key demand for achieving socialism is abolishing the family. Nationalizing the children has been a staple of socialist visions at least since Plato. So when it comes to the voters the left wants to attract from immigrant populations, mission accomplished! U.S. border policy is just giving the left a head start.

If you think I jest about the “abolishing the family,” just check out this recent item in The Nation:

Want To Dismantle Capitalism? Abolish the Family

Arguably the most infamous demand of The Communist Manifesto is the “abolition of the family.” The family, Marx and Engels noted, was where patriarchy and capitalism worked in tandem to produce willing, alienated workers, where women became little more than “instruments of production” for the men who lorded over them. Radical queer politics in the 1960s and ’70s added to their critique of the bourgeois family when activists challenged the heteronormativity of familial relations. That demand, however, has since almost completely vanished from the leftist imaginary.

Sophie Lewis, a feminist theorist and geographer, takes up this forgotten struggle in her work. Her new book, Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family(Verso, 2019) specifically links family abolition to a radical reconceptualization of pregnancy itself. The act of carrying a child to term, she insists, is work—labor that has long been exploited and overlooked by the academy—and so is mothering.

By thinking through the logic of commercial surrogacy arrangements, Lewis lays bare the ways motherhood has been weaponized as an ideological construct. She gives us an account of the material conditions—the biological and societal violence—that gestators, or people who are carrying fetuses, have to bear. Her book shows us that the ostensibly feminist objection to surrogacy arrangements underwrites the ossified and alienated familial relations that make capitalism possible.

I’ll spare you the rest (though if you do get through it, you learn a new term: (“repro-utopianism”), since of course it rests on a false premise: I don’t want to abolish capitalism at all. I want more of it.

Meanwhile, about those “migrants” surging to our southern border that Trump is aiming to control with his tariff threat against Mexico. I have several times before asked the logistical question of how these migrant caravans are being organized and provisioned. Strange that our news media seems uncurious about this aspect of the story. Maybe they are just cowards, as there is good reason to think the Mexican drug cartels may be behind a lot of this, as a destabilized and chaotic border makes it easier to smuggle drugs across the border.

There’s an interesting item up right now at the Conservative Review that says the Mexican drug cartels actually control most of the country:

Several weeks ago, the Mexican investigative journal Contralínea posted a map of Mexico prepared by the government of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO), showing that 80 percent of the country’s 266 districts recently targeted for enforcement by the Mexican National Guard in a new counter-cartel operation are either controlled (57.5 percent) or disputed (23.3 percent) by the cartels. . .

Thus, we now see from an internal document of the Mexican government an admission that Mexico has essentially lost control over every important populated area in Mexico outside Mexico City and a few others, and particularly the most sensitive areas of the U.S.-Mexican border.

The cartels have long passed the stage of simply profiting from drugs. They are international organizations that are engaged in endless criminality, most prominently human smuggling, but they seek to control territory and terrorize populations as well. Mexican drug cartels seek to replace local governments by imposing their own law.




To: Honey_Bee who wrote (138666)6/4/2019 3:51:44 PM
From: FJB3 Recommendations

Recommended By
bruwin
Honey_Bee
Mrjns

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 457312
 
CREEPY, SLEEPY, LOW IQ BIDEN WANTS TO SPEND $5 TRILLION ON GREEN FANTASY, BUT DEMS DON'T THINK THAT'S ENOUGH. REAL GREEN DEAL IS $95 TRILLION, AND THEY WON'T SPEND A PENNY LESS. LOL!


pjmedia.com

Joe Biden's 'Clean Energy Revolution' Is a Repackaged 'Green New Deal' But Dems Don't Like It

By Tyler O'Neil June 4, 2019



On Tuesday, former Vice President and current 2020 candidate Joe Biden unveiled his climate change plan, which he calls the "Clean Energy Revolution." To a large degree, his plan is a repackaged Green New Deal: calling for the same extreme goals but with more pro-America and pro-worker messaging. In his launch video, Biden also works hard to show he was a leader on climate alarmism long before any of the other candidates.

Even the beginning of Biden's "Clean Energy Revolution" launch video is upbeat: "Nothing gives me more hope for the future than seeing my five grandchildren challenge expectations. They see breakthroughs in technology we can’t even yet imagine, but the only way they’re going to get a chance to fulfill all that potential is if we take drastic action right now to address the climate disaster facing the nation and our world."

Naturally, the video does not address the long history of climate alarmist's failed predictions, from concrete temperature claims to the prophecy of the Maldives sinking beneath the waves (2018 came and went, but the Maldives are still here). Instead, alarmists like Biden merely point to storms and fires as "proof," as if the predictions didn't even exist.


As the video goes on, Biden lays out a drastic plan to address the issue, taking pointers from the Green New Deal proposed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "Biden believes the Green New Deal is a crucial framework for meeting the climate challenges we face. It powerfully captures two basic truths, which are at the core of his plan: (1) the United States urgently needs to embrace greater ambition on an epic scale to meet the scope of this challenge, and (2) our environment and our economy are completely and totally connected," the plan says.

Yet Biden lifts more than just these from the Green New Deal. He also adopts the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by the year 2050. "We’re going to invest $1.7 trillion in securing our future so that by 2050, the United States will be 100 percent clean energy economy with net-zero emissions," the candidate says in the video.

The former Vice President adds a few things Ocasio-Cortez would not have thought of. "By the end of my first term, we’re going to have an enforcement mechanism in place to make sure we stay on track to get there," he adds. This would make sure those pesky Republicans who don't want to derail America's economy can't prevent the march to the Stone Age if they beat Biden in 2024.

Naturally, the 2020 candidate also called for handouts for the Green Industrial Complex. "We’re going to make record-breaking investments in research and development and zero carbon technologies, so that America is the engine of the world’s clean energy economy, exporting cutting-edge equipment stamped 'Made in the USA' to help other nations reduce emissions and mitigate and adapt," Biden said.

Myron Ebell, director at the Center for Energy and the Environment at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), explained that this is one of the key goals of climate alarmist policy. "Global warming might become a problem but it's not a crisis," Ebell told PJ Media in January. "The crisis has been manufactured in order to create a huge climate industrial complex that can command the redistribution of colossal amounts of money."

"There is a huge climate industrial complex benefitting from this, but it's not reducing emissions," he said. Even "if the United States reduced its emissions to zero, it would have no impact on global warming, because Chinese emissions have gone up so rapidly."

Biden actually does address the threat of Chinese emissions, but he merely suggests that American diplomacy can convince the Communist country to buck its own self-interest in favor of global climate alarmism. Interestingly, Biden was the point person for the Obama administration's efforts on China, and he reportedly went soft on the Middle Kingdom while his son carried out massive deals with Chinese officials. So when Biden talks about holding China accountable, Americans can know just how that works out.

Like Ocasio-Cortez, Biden tries to sell his radical climate plan by promising good jobs. "This initiative will create more than 10 million new good-paying jobs all across the clean economy in the United States of America. It’s an enormous opportunity," he says.

Then he launches into a pro-America and pro-worker message that echoes the Democratic Party of yore, not the Intersectional mess of today. "We’re not going to forget the workers either. The workers who through dangerous and back-breaking labor powered our industrial rise, mined and built our arsenal of democracy, and fueled America’s prosperity through the 20th century," Biden says.

Biden ends his video message with a nod to his long climate alarmist activism. "For more than three decades I've led on this issue," he says to millennials who think Ocasio-Cortez was the first person to demand an overhaul of the economy due to climate alarmism.

While the former vice president often comes across as a moderate in the 2020 race, he makes his no-compromise position clear in the video, saying, "I will not accept half measures."

Indeed, Biden's plan is as radical as the Green New Deal, just packaged smarter. Where the Green New Deal calls for the laughably absurd proposal of "upgrading all existing buildings in the United States," Biden's plan calls for new building codes, "creating incentives for deep retrofits," and a "package of affordable energy efficiency retrofits in American homes."

Like Ocasio-Cortez, Biden wants to remake the buildings in America. He's just smarter about couching this ridiculous proposal in policy language, calling for "incentives," building codes, and government "investment," rather than an obviously absurd demand for every building in the U.S. to be upgraded.

Similarly, the former vice president adds finesse to the Green New Deal's suggestion that high-speed rail can replace or reduce automobiles and air transportation. Biden's plan calls for America to "spark the second great railroad revolution."

"Today, the U.S. is lagging behind Europe and China in rail safety and speed. Biden will develop a plan to ensure that America haas the cleanest, safest, and fastest rail system in the world — for both passengers and freight," the plan says. It calls for increased speeds from New York to D.C., and trains connecting the Northeast to the South and across the Midwest and West. The plan also focuses on rail for freight.

"This plan will reduce pollution, help connect workers to quality jobs with shorter commutes, and spur investment in communities more efficiently connected to major metropolitan areas," the Biden campaign declares. The more subtle message: Biden is trying to replace the great American trucking industry with large government investments in railroads. America's highway system has already transformed the country in many of these ways, but climate alarmists like Biden prefer the old driver of industrialism over the more individualistic automobile.

Not every aspect of Biden's plan is bad. For instance, the former vice president calls for research into "all low- and zero-carbon technologies," including nuclear power. Nuclear is one of the cleanest, most cost-effective forms of energy production, and American reactors are extremely safe. Nuclear is one of the more viable paths forward, if climate alarmists are serious about low-cost energy in addition to fighting carbon (most of them are not).

Biden's plan will reportedly cost $5 trillion — although that may not include the high long-term costs of decarbonizing U.S. energy — and climate activists have already attacked him for not being aggressive enough.

"It showed a lack of ambition or understanding about the true crisis that we're in," Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth Action, an environmental group, told SFGate, responding to the Reuters report about Biden's plan. "If that was a trial balloon, it was shot down."

The pro-Green New Deal Sunrise Movement tweeted that Biden's plan is "a start…but unless candidates raise the bar, entire nations will go underwater and millions of people will die." The alarmist group added, "It’s not clear that Biden is committed to moving away from the 'all-of-the-above' energy strategy that characterized the Obama administration at the speed and scale that science demand. To fail to do so would condemn our generation to an unimaginable world."


It’s not clear that Biden is committed to moving away from the “all-of-the-above” energy strategy that characterized the Obama administration at the speed and scale that science demand.

To fail to do so would condemn our generation to an unimaginable world.

— Sunrise Movement ?? (@sunrisemvmt) June 4, 2019


The Washington Post's Dave Weigel said the former vice president's plan is closer to Hillary Clinton's 2016 proposal than to the plans proposed by other 2020 candidates like Gov. Jay Inslee (D-Wash.).

Joe Biden may be the current frontrunner in the 2020 Democratic primary, but he won't be able to please the far left and run his heartland campaign to defeat Donald Trump. His repackaged Green New Deal seems dead on arrival, even though it arguably charts a far smarter path forward on these issues. Biden just isn't radical enough for the Democrats, and the Democrats are too radical for Americans. Responses like this are helping Trump get re-elected.



Follow Tyler O'Neil, the author of this article, on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (138666)6/4/2019 4:36:56 PM
From: steve harris  Respond to of 457312
 
Outstanding!