Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1139570)	6/5/2019 5:27:21 PM
From: PKRBKR	3 Recommendations Recommended By Bill Tenchusatsu TideGlider Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1570751

So only .1% of the individuals on the list of 30,000 signatures have a scientific background in Climatology. To be fair, we can add in those who claim to have a background in Atmospheric Science, which brings the total percentage of signatories with a background in climate change science to a whopping .5%. BS. Anyone that has ever taken a thermodynamics class or even an organic chemistry class would understand how much of a joke AGW is given CO2 concentration is in the noise. Looking at the temp data for the past 1M years shows the GW scare is in the noise. Any "Scientist" that can't see that has an agenda and isn't using science at all.