SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (1141218)6/12/2019 11:29:51 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Respond to of 1579807
 
Why Is Congress Letting This Man Set America’s Trade Policy?

by ANDREW EGGER

JUNE 12, 2019 4:51 AM


Donald Trump at CPAC. (Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Print

Are Republicans in Congress finally ready to play hardball with Trump on trade? That was the scuttlebutt last week following Trump’s unexpected declaration that he was slapping a heavy new tariff on Mexico to punish them for failing to solve the problem of illegal immigration into the U.S. for him. The Senate GOP erupted in protest at the announcement, which would have amounted to a massive new tax on American consumers. Texas senator John Cornyn described the prospect as “holding a gun to our own heads.”

Faced with the possibility of open revolt, the president quickly reversed course, announcing that Mexico had caved to his masterful pressure (Narrator: they hadn’t) and that the tariffs were thus no longer necessary. Thus was the potential disaster of the U.S. opening another front in its current trade war with China averted.

Good for congressional Republicans! It’s not enough.

This latest trade outcome is good news, but it’s an exception that proves the rule: President Trump gets more comfortable in his self-appointed role as Tariff Bully by the day. It’s not, of course, that he’s a new convert to protectionism: railing against America’s trade deals made up a huge chunk of Trump’s 2016 campaign. But after he took office, it took the president a good long time to work up to throwing his trade weight around: The White House’s first unilateral tariff action, a comparatively minor duty on imported washing machines, didn’t come until January 2018.

The year and a half since, however, has seen the president using (and threatening to use) his tariff authority at an increasing pace and in an increasingly erratic way. In 2018, that mostly took the form of starting one trade war with China and threatening another with Europe. Now, however, the president has begun to reach for the threat of tariffs in diplomatic situations that decreasingly have anything to do with trade at all, as with the aforementioned immigration tiff, or Trump’s repeated, bizarre threats to slap new tariffs on China if President Xi Jinping declines to meet with him at an international summit later this month.

[ There's a real possibility that Xi won't show up just to save face. ]

It’s not hard to see why tariffs are a weapon Trump keeps whipping out at the slightest provocation. Contra the assurances of the free traders in his administration, the president has never made a secret of his belief that tariffs are a positive economic good. He seems to see them as a source of free money that strong nations can effortlessly extract from weaker ones. Couple that with what is commonly and politely referred to as Trump’s “improvisational” governing style—his propensity, in other words, to make grave policy choices based on the first notion that pops into his head—and you have a recipe for the foreign policy doctrine we increasingly see: Trump endeavoring to solve any foreign policy irritant through a vigorous application of tariffs.

Congress, if they wish, can spend the next two to six years putting out the fires that result. Hopefully, they will demonstrate they have the spine to do at least that. But for Congress to spend their time chasing the president’s trade moves—responding to each ad hoc tariff attack with an equal and opposite reaction of their own—would only solve part of the problem. The bigger issue is the economic anxiety the president invites each time he flails his tariff weapons around, the market instability that results when he does so incessantly, and the damage it does to our diplomatic relations each time the president shows that America cannot be counted on to honor its agreements.

If they wish to address these issues, Congress should act proactively: not just pledging to oppose future irresponsible trade actions from the White House, but actually moving to restrict the White House’s power to set U.S. trade policy by decree. This is, after all, a power vested by the Constitution in the Congress. Re-asserting this prerogative would require no great act of creativity: Sen. Mike Lee has already introduced a bill that would require Congress to sign off on any new trade barrier the White House wanted to put in place.

But does Congress actually want to commit to such a solution? Or would they rather continue to wag their heads when Trump throws around tariff threats, hoping to wheedle him into sparing them a tough vote at some point down the road.

If history is any indication, we’ll find out the answer to this question sooner, rather than later.

thebulwark.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1141218)6/12/2019 11:36:31 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579807
 
Trump can't go to the well & deliver coherent thoughts bc his mind is empty. Elementary school nicknames are the best he can do. He can barely read & anything non scripted goes in to a ditch. Fox cut away from his babble a/b tractors w/ internet access.

Aaron Rupar?Verified account @atrupar

Beyond parody -- Fox Business cuts away from Trump's speech right after he laments, bizarrely, that tractors can't hook up to the internet


twitter.com



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1141218)6/12/2019 12:15:47 PM
From: rxbond1 Recommendation

Recommended By
longnshort

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579807
 
"the Constitution says this power should belong to Congress"

The first three words in the constitution are the most powerful. They declare that the Constitution derives its power not from Congress but from the people themselves. Power to the people. Your loop hole is illegals. Strange place to be.

The days of lets make believe, trust the govt, go with the flow is over. You have been unshackled. Not too long ago EVERYONE cried out for "CHANGE"...Finally, here we are.