SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Snowshoe who wrote (149161)6/14/2019 6:53:32 PM
From: Snowshoe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217739
 
Oops, I meant to say but the fuel source doesn't look scalable.



To: Snowshoe who wrote (149161)6/14/2019 6:55:03 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217739
 
I clip / copy / paste from my e-mail tray

On 15 Jun 2019, at 6:25 AM, J wrote:

1. It is doubtful that team Norway would be the going-forward commercial leader in anything to do w/ hydrogen, because the team lacks

(i) capabilities that can only be developed in broad-sphere post-pilot applications,
(ii) capacities that would drop the cost across the entirety of commercial value-chain,
(iii) political cohesion to enable allocation of high-risk capital,
(iv) legislative foresight to facilitate science-based overarching guidance
(v) etc etc etc
(vi) therefore absent all-society spark for mobilisation to get the job done

2. Count on the world to be blessed w/ hydrogen future, enhanced w/ limitless clean renewable energy eco-system that takes us to the next level

3. In such a world, 5G, quantum, genetic engineering, food, climate, and everything else would be mere afterthought, or maybe footnote, or possibly matter of course

4. Brave new world, and one where revisionist make-coal-great-again won’t cut the beef that isn’t there

5. Given the overarching noble cause, I suppose the planet is not on the cusp of grand unification of trade / currency / technology / civilisation wars, but well into the philosophical conflict of brains, driven by respective imperatives, with one side desperate to hang on to what was, and the other team enthusiastic to recreate what once were

6. Once in 800-years, and across the planet folks shall choose to engage one way or another path

7. To fund the conflict amongst the progressives vs revisionists, perhaps the politicians shall have to wager all of galactic savings pool to make it all happen, and if so, well, … the 9999 shallow but evergreen puddle might matter

8. Meantime in HK, let us watch Sunday. Very exciting. Everything should turn out to be okay.

On 15 Jun 2019, at 2:09 AM, H wrote:

jalopnik.com

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 2:30 AM M wrote:

My problem with hydrogen is distribution.
We're going to set up an entirely new distribution system to transport hydrogen?
Meanwhile, the electric grid is already in place.

Not sure that hydrogen will be the winner.
The Zeppelin manufacturers all thought hydrogen was going to be the winner until the Hindenburg....

M