Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (149184)	6/17/2019 8:49:10 AM
From: Horgad	1 Recommendation Recommended By ggersh Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217740

If the measure hasn't change over time, the relativity of the inequality is accurate. But in any case, denying that there is an issue and justifying the reasons (some of which I can agree with), is a futile exercise. In places where there is enough inequality or even enough perception of inequality and unfairness, the shit will hit the fan and arguing/reasoning against it is futile. Over the years, I've heard these same arguments so many times from so many people justifying their wealth and the poverty of others. And to no avail I use to often take the opposite of the argument, but now I am like "So what? You may as well go plead with a coming hurricane....."