Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1142428)	6/17/2019 9:13:13 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578886

Wharfie, The majority of Jefferson would be on your side, so I can see why you want it. It would mean 2 new R senators in DC, and maybe one less D congressperson from Calif, because of the change in population. I'd be fine with a trade. Jefferson's statehood for D.C.'s statehood. I say let the citizens of California decide whether to allow it. You obviously didn't read what I said in my last post. The California state government won't allow the people of California to decide. They won't even allow the issue on the ballot because they don't think it's a valid question. Now I'll wait while you come up with all sorts of excuses telling me why it's a good thing that the citizens of California aren't allowed to vote on it. Tenchusatsu