Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Donahoe who wrote (16497)	1/21/1998 12:57:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 24154

I remember paying for the blades and getting the razor for free. You remember what you want to remember, John. Facts are stupid things. So, you go for a "buy one, get one free" deal, the 2nd one really costs $0? If you say so. As for your various definitions, who cares. In a legal proceeding, it's something for the lawyers to debate and the judges to decide. There is no cost. Actually there is a net gain. So, it's not true that "Nothing in life is free"? Take it up with Reggie. Cheers, Dan.

To: John Donahoe who wrote (16497)	1/22/1998 12:44:00 AM
From: Gerald R. Lampton	Respond to of 24154

>"What, precisely is the cost to us all of "free" IE, in its various guises?" >There is no cost. Actually there is a net gain. The effect is to reduce the price of the >'puter and accelerate access to the "information superhighway". Which inturn will >increase our productivity and wealth. Which is a net plus. There is an economic cost to "free ie." The artificially low price leads to overconsumption, which is inefficient. It also causes distortions in corporate resource allocation as the business has no economic foundation on which to base R&D decisions. Economic inefficiency leads to a reduction in overall economic welfare. Of course, Microsoft says IE is not free: the cost of IE is included in the operating system.