Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Starbuck who wrote (6575)	1/21/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: jimmy	Respond to of 10368

>>>Suppose the FY 1997 EPS of $.44 as estimated by Mr. Kecseg (the analyst) comes true. The Darlington pooling should add something to that $0.44 estimate. Based on the revenue numbers that have been tossed about, I would think that Darlington should add at least 10 cents to BNGO's 1997 EPS. Then again, maybe they will "structure" the numbers to show Darlington contributing little, or nothing, to 1997's EPS... makes it easier to show growth in '98.

To: Starbuck who wrote (6575)	1/21/1998 12:55:00 PM
From: Jonathan Brown	Respond to of 10368

Socks redux Here's an alternative read on the famous "socks" statement from AB&G investor relations: the players knew Wilson's departure was in the works. They also knew that if Wilson, the company's founder, were indeed leaving and selling his shares, this might cause investors to wonder about the company's future. After all, if BNGO is such a fabulous investment, with bla-bla earnings growth and woof-woof leadership, why would the company's founder be so hot to dump his stake in it? Hmm? No doubt there's a plausible explanation. But meanwhile, the company may have thought, let's give it a superpositive spin! This is fantastic news, destined to forever place $6.50 in the rear view mirror of this rapidly accelerating Viper! Wow, look at those socks go! Just a thought, folks. J