To: tech who wrote (2244 ) 1/21/1998 1:35:00 PM From: angel Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3391
Because you say you dont read Yahoo I decided to cut and paste things said about you here for your comment. Tell me why everyone thinks you are a con artist? Tell me how CSGI allows this to happen unless they PAY you to say these things? Maybe you are a member of the PR firm? By: baronss Date: Jan 5 1998 1:41 P.M PST Reply To: Msg. 4 by stkmas There is a person in SI who is trying to hype up this stock. Looking at his postings this guy (call him tech) is either very stupid or is a PR person for CSGI . Technically all the claims about 100% automatic conversion are false. Even making a blanket claim like 95% automatic ocnversion is not correct because this percentage will vary greatly depending on different components in the system. Lastly actually changing the code is a very small fraction of the work involved in Y2K compliance. Major chunk of work involved is in design and testing. If there is a NASD investigation against CSGI they should check out this person at SI and why he is trying to hype CSGI. This looks like another CAML. Subj: You are right By: AndyY2K Date: Jan 6 1998 11:58 A.M PST Reply To: Msg. 5 by baronss I checked out SI. He spent a great deal of time cutting and pasting to hype. No one with a regular job will spent that much time to hype or maybe he is getting cheap shares or money for his effort. Internet is crawling with lowly hypsters like him. I think he is a stupid feeble-minded person. Subj: Stop pushing the scam, shit-head! By: AndyY2K Date: Jan 15 1998 9:24 A.M PST Reply To: Msg. 8 by fesaTech a.k.a Shawn Murphy a.k.a. a$$hole liar You have been pushing this scam since it was at $14. Where is it now? Hey, I got news for you........... The 5 year old that you bragged often is NOT YOURS. Wanna verify? Get her DNA test and swallow THE BLODDY TRUTH. Puke on you scumbag! Subj: csgi to 0 By: cbslbob Date: Jan 18 1998 3:22 P.M PST Reply To: Msg. 10 by AndyY2KI heard that a canadian company allmost lost a very important cotract because of the failure of the csgi toolset . They have found a better tool and I think that the csgi toolset is history with them. I guess its possible that the fuck up can be fixed or is allready fixed by csgi but by the way the stock price is acting it looks like they could be having problems. Subj: JDN, MadOMonk is 'tech', the paid hypster in SI. By: shorts_shaver_98 Date: Jan 21 1998 8:36 A.M PST Reply To: Msg. 16 by Nicewonger He has already sold his a*s to a scam. He plans to sell his daughter too, IMHO. BTW, his wife just eloped with a monk. I heard that in the street of Phoenix. CSGI will file chapter 11 soon, IMHO. Have a good day. View Replies to this Message Subj: CSGI stinks! By: AndyY2K Date: Jan 21 1998 9:49 A.M PST Reply To: Msg. 17 by shorts_shaver_98 Everything you need to know about CSGI -- in their OWN words: From the 1/14/97 10Q: Although the Company is actively marketing its ConSyGen 2000 and ConSyGen Conversion toolsets, the Company is not currently generating significant revenue from its ConSyGen 2000 or its ConSyGen Conversion toolset, or otherwise. Although the Company has completed several pilot (non-revenue generating) Year 2000 conversion projects, and is currently working on two revenue generating conversion projects, the Company has not yet completed a revenue generating Year 2000 conversion project. ============= TPRO makes more money from selling a single CD than CSGI does from an entire Y2K project.