SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (149401)6/26/2019 4:21:49 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218117
 
Do not know whether rates are headed up or not. If rates head up, would likely be because the officialdom lost control, or mind. Would not be due to economic strength.

“Fiat Money Inflation in France” in play on one channel mises.org

In the mean time, “Before Zero” is the episode shown on the other channel

Bullish

zerohedge.com

"Monstrous" VaR Shock Looms As Global Bond Duration Hits All Time High

Earlier today, Austria priced only its second 100-year bond in history at a shocking yield of just over 1.00%, prompting financial commentators to ask " what fresh madness is this." Alas, it's no madness, and is in fact perfectly rational behavior by investors in a world where central banks have pushed $13 trillion in debt to negative yields, forcing investors to buy anything that still yields above zero (or zero, as is the case of gold and cryptos).

Alas, this forced herding of investors into the clutches of debt at any cost will end up with catastrophic consequences - as Bloomberg cautions today, with investors scrambling to pick up any last trace of yield in response to idiotic easy-money policies, a trillion-dollar monster is foming in the bond market, "the likes of which has never been seen in decades of history."

The reason: so much debt has been sold at low yields that even a modest bump in yields near record lows "could inflict a world of pain for traders the world over."

The technical terms for all this, of course, is "duration - the measure of sensitivity to interest-rate changes - and specifically duration which is now at never before seen highs for sovereign debt.



This means that even the smallest inflationary or growth impulse - like a favorable outcome from Saturday's G-20 meeting - could send long-end yields surging, resulting in the mother of all VaR shocks, as banks take record mark-to-market losses on their portfolios.

It's also why for some investors, buying duration - i.e., long-maturity debt - is now recipe for career suicide. Some, such as Thomas Graff, say that "buying duration isn’t a great trade anymore." The head of fixed-income at Brown Advisory said that curbing exposures to longer-dated risk since big bets are already priced into markets, including U.S. rate cuts. “Even if we are heading toward a place of lower rates - or even if the current range is a kind of normal - it’s not going to be a one-way train."

Well, it has been a one-way train for now, the question is what happens when it reverses, and how quickly will the "weak hands" puke, resulting in the biggest MTM losses in bond history.

That said, not everyone is a skeptic: bond giants such as Pimco, Amundi and Lombard Odier Investment Managers don’t see longer-term premiums awakening from their slumber anytime soon... or rather, they are just talking their books.

Meanwhile, as duration hits all time highs, the index of compensation investors demand to hold longer-term Treasuries versus rolling over short-dated obligations, known as the term premium, is near record lows "underscoring the intense conviction in the low-rate, lowflation era in markets" according to Bloomberg. The situation is so insane that the asking yield on Swiss bonds due 2064 even fell below zero percent last week.



Meanwhile, as global yields have plunged to the lowest on record, rate shorts have gotten pulverized.



And while the bulls are gloating, even a modest increase in rates would result in catastrophic losses: with the Macaulay duration on the Bloomberg Barclays sovereign-debt index at a record high of 8.32 years, this translates into a DV01 of $24BN, meaning just a one-percentage-point increase in yields would translate into a $2.4 trillion loss - enough to launch a new financial crisis if banks are forced by their regulators to make good for the paper shortfall.

For now, however, there are no gray swans in sight, as the world continues to slowdown, perversely because the world has too much debt to grow at historical rates. In fact, the more debt there is, the lower the interest rates have to be. And that's exactly what we have been seeing across 10Y yields in the US and Germany.



That said, there is one risk on the horizon as the world slides into Albert Edwards' deflationary ice age, that may reverse the latest dovish tsunami by the world's central banks: The prospect of easing tensions in global commerce; that's what is keeping Pimco from duration overweights, despite the firm’s conviction that the Federal Reserve is at the peak of its hiking cycle.

"We are broadly neutral in the near term as there’s still a lot of uncertainty," Nicola Mai, a portfolio manager at Pimco in London, told Bloomberg. "The Fed might stay on hold if there is positive development."

Lombard Odier, however is more pragmatic, seeing any brief inflationary spikes as just a detour from a deflationary singularity and will trade any rise in yields as a buying opportunity.

“Rates sell-offs are a bigger risk when we get tightening,” said Salman Ahmed, the firm’s chief global strategist. “In the next few months, we are likely to see almost every central bank easing.”

Meanwhile, Bloomberg notes that at Amundi Asset Management in London, extended duration in the market isn’t keeping Laurent Crosnier awake at night. But he’s pondering a longer-term tail risk: Central-bank impotence in boosting growth could even spark a sell off one day.

“At one point the market may start challenging central banks about the effectiveness of their monetary policy,” said the chief investment officer. “They may start pricing in credit risk, and that’s going to push yields higher.”

Ah yes, but as JPMorgan said over the weekend, central banks losing control would result in a far greater plunge in stocks, and where will investors park their proceeds? Why in bonds of course (as well as gold and, increasingly cryptos).



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (149401)6/26/2019 7:24:15 PM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation

Recommended By
marcher

  Respond to of 218117
 
More pilot deficiencies coming to light, that they cannot code on the fly whilst diving, and spinning heavy-set wheels, and reading / ruminating on the meanings of the instruction manual - go figure

Boeing told the truth when it’s management noted ‘human error’, but identified the wrong folks

zerohedge.com

New Software Glitch Found On 737 MAX That Results In "Uncontrollable Nosedives"

Maybe Boeing will finally think twice before cutting corners and slashing costs on planes it hopes will become the standard in commercial air travel. Then again, maybe not.

With Boeing's fleet of 737 MAX planes indefinitely grounded after unexpected problems with the MCAS system costs hundreds of people their lives in two fatal crashes, tests on the grounded planes revealed a new, and unrelated safety risk in the computer system for the Boeing 737 Max that could push the plane downward the FAA announced; the discovery could lead to further lengthy delays before the aircraft is allowed return to service.

A series of simulator flights to test new software developed by Boeing revealed the flaw, a source told CNN. In simulator tests, government pilots discovered that a microprocessor failure could push the nose of the plane toward the ground. It is not known whether the microprocessor played a role in either crash.

737 Flight SimulatorWhile the original crashes remain under investigation, preliminary reports showed that "a new stabilization system pushed both planes into steep nosedives from which the pilots could not recover." The issue is known in aviation circles as runaway stabilizer trim.

“The FAA recently found a potential risk that Boeing must mitigate,” the agency said in an emailed statement on Wednesday, without providing any specifics.

While the latest glitch is separate from, and did not involve the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System linked to the two fatal accidents since October that killed 346 people, it could produce an uncommanded dive similar to what occurred in the crashes, Bloomberg confirmed, also citing an unnamed source..

Meanwhile, piling damage control upon damage control, Boeing announced it could break the chain of events that led to both crashes by developing a software fix that would limit the potency of that stabilization system. In other words, for every uncontrolled dive there is a software upgrade... allegedly. The problem is that the broader public is becoming increasingly disgusted by what is a clear culture of cutting corners and rolling out flying coffins that crash to earth the moment there is a BSOD.

Boeing engineers are now trying to address the issue, which has led to another delay in recertifying the 737 Max.
"The safety of our airplanes is Boeing's highest priority. We are working closely with the FAA to safely return the MAX to service," Boeing said in a statement. The sources say Boeing engineers are trying to determine if the microprocessor issue can be fixed by reprogramming software or if replacing the physical microprocessors on each 737 Max aircraft may be required.

When testing the potential failure of the microprocessor in the simulators, "it was difficult for the test pilots to recover in a matter of seconds," one of the sources said. "And if you can't recover in a matter of seconds, that's an unreasonable risk."

The good news for Boeing is that despite the disastrous track record of flawed executive decisions and cut corners, its stocks has so far managed to recover every single time, if a little longer than "seconds." Even so, it remains well below the level it hit after its second plane went down, following the infamous MCAS failure.



Another crash, however, and BA will find just how unpleasant gravity can be, even if the consequences of a stock crash allow (most) shareholders to live and tell all about it.