Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Harvard Scientific (HVSF)Hot$$- male impotency medicine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riverlightning who wrote (2826)	1/21/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: don roberson	Respond to of 3906

Jim: Thanks for putting forth a post that again shows the "other side" of this investment. I hope one day we will all look back and laugh at our skepticism. For such a great post, I'll share any free samples I receive when I make trip to their facilities when they get settled in down here in Florida.

To: Riverlightning who wrote (2826)	1/21/1998 5:03:00 PM
From: dino	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3906

Jim....do you have the phone number & contact person's name?? I would like to call them to see why they are so high on this company & make sure they have taken everything into consideration. Like most everyone, I would love to see it & feel that we will get a decent pop in 1998 (to the $3-5 range) based on signs of managements progress (Phase II starting & completing, etc.) I think Waite has a way of making things work to his advantage, be it legit or not, & I am willling to ride it out with that in mind combined with the minimal downside risk at these levels. Maybe RAP or GrandPobah (forgot how you spell it) wouldn't mind calling this analyst as I agree that they have the most history with this company. By the way, changing auditors is never a positive sign unless they can strictly point the reasoning at excessive fees or due to office location issues (which maybe HVSF can use to justify this).