Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (149448)	6/29/2019 3:12:14 AM
From: Maurice Winn	3 Recommendations Recommended By Arran Yuan arun gera elmatador Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 218249

That's a pile of racist tendentious twaddle. It claims the cheapest bidders for work are ipso facto no good for the job. Indians are just fine as software developers. In fact Tarken, our Geek son, considered starting a company to outsource software development from Japan to India. Being fluent in Japanese he would provide the quality control and management. Boeing obviously figured out the same thing = paying a fortune in USA is a much worse idea that hiring low paid superGeeks in India. In the same way in 1986 in BP I wanted BP to set up R&D in China and upgrade from expensive 120 IQ. German men in Deutsche BP R&D centre to 160 IQ cheap women in China. The problem for Boeing was in quality management not in hiring Indians. But still the problem looks most like an airline pilot selection and training deficiency. What my ex 737 captain brother and Elroy say looks most correct. I have not consulted my recently retired 737 captain brother in law. I have used only 1 r word but that should be enough for a winning argument. Paying lots of money does NOT assure good quality as I explained regarding Qualcomm lawyers who subsequently proved me correct. Mqurice