To: TobagoJack who wrote (149523 ) 7/2/2019 11:46:59 PM From: Snowshoe 1 RecommendationRecommended By elmatador
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 218069 re "Look ... the search item result in item mentioning, glaringly, of the improbable, but smoking gun complicity by Silicon Ranch w/ enemy numero uno by way of sham Luxembourg-China manufacturing, but when one clicks into the article ... the smoking gun is not to be found, meaning scrubbed, presumably for a good reason, especially if politicians are involved and the flavor of the social temperature changes to be less understanding. Yes?" Hello TJ, There is no smoking gun. Here's what happened... 1) You ran a Google search for 'Bredesen Silicon Ranch China'. 2) You got a search result mentioning the text "Luxembourg-Chinese manufacturer solar panels" for the following article date April 26, 2016... Silicon Ranch to build state’s biggest solar project nashvillepost.com 3) So why doesn't the above article say anything about a Luxembourg-Chinese manufacturer? Because Google search results are based on the contents of the entire web page, not just the article itself! That can include invisible stuff buried in the html code. 4) Scroll down to the bottom of the article and you'll find links to a bunch of other articles about solar energy. In this instance, the web page's html source code has an invisible buried teaser for the following brief notice from July 2011...Solar power station builder inks supplier deal nashvillepost.com "Choice Solar Solutions has committed to buying photovoltaic panels from a Luxembourg-Chinese manufacturer solar panels for the next three years. The agreement between the companies involves modules that will have a generation capacity of 30 megawatt peak. Choice intends to roll them out at installations in Tennessee, Alabama and South Carolina." 5) That brief article links to this detailed press release dated July 8, 2011...CNPV Signs Long Term Sales Agreement with Choice Solar Solutions prnewswire.com 6) Conclusion: This is just a simple case of confusion caused by the way Google search operates, coupled with some odd coding in the html source. I don't see any conspiracy to censor the news. - Snow