SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1146377)7/3/2019 2:13:11 PM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1578946
 
white supremacists wear pants also is that a symbol



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1146377)7/3/2019 2:44:49 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578946
 
Wharfie,
Does that make sense? Not to me.
Of course it doesn't make sense in today's postmodern society, but back then it was a real sticking point. Even the abolitionists of the time couldn't simply ban slavery without severe political repercussions.

Even Lincoln had to tiptoe around the issue until the Civil War got underway. And even after that, he didn't make abolition a goal until two years in. Popular support for abolition wasn't a sure thing until then.

To go back and reject the entire founding of the Republic because of slavery is to throw the baby out with the bathwater, and for what? You tell me. History is history. It's never perfect, and there is no historical figure that doesn't have skeletons in his or her closet.

Either that, or Colin Krapernick should repudiate his support for Che Guevera because of his anti-gay views.

Tenchusatsu