Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: uu who wrote (31468)	1/21/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: David Jones	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

>You know, I used to be a hard core Republican. I have never voted for any Democrats. But with all these talks and allegations against...< This is the ASND thread. Please that these comments over to the 'Draft dodging, Pot Smoking, Skirt Chasing, Lying' thread.

To: uu who wrote (31468)	1/21/1998 5:28:00 PM
From: Bald Eagle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

OT The media is made up mainly of liberals who have been very kind to Clinton. Never mind the "stud" label, what ever happened to family values and honoring the covenant of marriage, or is that just right wing extremism nowadays? If his wife can't trust him, why should we? Sorry, but IMHO he's the sorriest excuse for a U.S. president that I've ever seen. BTW, SUNW is dropping, any ideas why? BTW, Rush Limbaugh has been talking about this affair since at least a year ago, probably longer. I guess he is "right" again.

To: uu who wrote (31468)	1/21/1998 6:42:00 PM
From: Father E.	Respond to of 61433

As a matter of fact I am a staunch democrat but since the democrats could not find any one better than this moral swamp monster I haven't voted democrat. I just go into the booth and vote all Republican. I am even thinking of making a donation to the republican party!!! I would think we could find someone for our children to look up to not grown men with hormone problems like Kennedy's and Clinton. Want to make a bet that Hillary walks out on <<Share my bed Bill>> when he gets out of the White House???

To: uu who wrote (31468)	1/21/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: Daniel W. Koehler	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 61433

Addi: Take it from a lifelong resident of Arkansas who has had the chance to observe WJC both as Governor and President. The man is an incredibly facile liar. He had a woman Betsy Wright who was his "dustbuster" and cleaned up all of his bimbo eruptions. He has admitted that he had infidelity problems in his 92 campaign. Did you notice how he used the present tense when asked by Jim Lehrer about a sexual relationship. Weasel words and clinton clauses are his forte. Coedgate doesn't bother me (helll, I'm a libertarian). Suborning perjury does bother me! It will probably precipitate a selloff in the market and a crisis of confidence If he's boffing the help, that's his business. It was common knowledge in Little Rock that Hillary and Vince Foster were an item and that WJC had women stashed all over LR in f**kpads for his nocturnal peregrinations. I hope to God he pulls a Jimmy Swaggert, gets on national TV with his dog, bites his lip and cries out for forgiveness. Maybe he can grandstand his way out of this. But if he persists in denial, I think he will be hoisted on his own petard. And market may go into tailspin. Anyone remember how Watergate impacted the stock market in the 70's? If you and I and Clinton were pinned down in a foxhole, I wouldn't send Clinton back to get more ammo. We know what he did to his friends to stay in office, what will he do to to save his Presidency? Declare war on Albania? ( Anyone see "Wag the Dog"? Is life imitating art?) Addi, sorry for the diatribe. But, I have met him and Hillary when I was a banker,( worked with Webb Hubbell on banking legal issues) and have some good friends at the Rose Firm in Little Rock .IMHO, WJC is capable of anything at this stage! Daniel

To: uu who wrote (31468)	1/22/1998 1:15:00 AM
From: john dodson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 61433

Addi, ******** OT ************ Clearly you didn't have all the facts about the Clinton thing. The reason it's so important is the claim that he asked/coerced the lady into lying at the Paula Jones deposition about their having a sexual relationship. Her testimony was such that she swore they had no relationship, and was later indicated to be false. The salient point here is that the president asked her to lie. This is seriously grounds for impeachment. I'll go so far as to say that if they can prove this, Clinton is finished! It's very similar to the Watergate debacle. BTW, Needless to say, this could single-handedly cause a severe bear market, if the claims are proven to be true. -John Dodson