SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (1148425)7/10/2019 3:18:55 PM
From: Winfastorlose1 Recommendation

Recommended By
IC720

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577024
 
Bombshell: Alex Acosta Reportedly Claimed Jeffrey Epstein "Belonged To Intelligence"



by Tyler Durden
Wed, 07/10/2019 - 08:10

Authored by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

To appreciate the significance of what I’m about to share, you really need to go back and read yesterday’s post: The Jeffrey Epstein Rabbit Hole Goes a Lot Deeper Than You Think.



In that piece, I shared many lesser known, but extremely bizarre facts about Jeffrey Epstein and the people around him. I also noted that it appeared his real job was to run a blackmail operation to ensnare some of the most wealthy and powerful people on earth. I alluded to the possibility that he was collecting this priceless information on behalf of a third party, and then just today we learn the following via the Daily Beast:

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)...

For almost two decades, for some nebulous reason, whether to do with ties to foreign intelligence, his billions of dollars, or his social connections, Epstein, whose alleged sexual sickness and horrific assaults on women without means or ability to protect themselves is well-known in his circle, remained untouchable.

It should be noted the reason I attach credibility to the above is based on who wrote it, Vicky Ward. She has an extensive history of digging into Epstein, and wrote one of the earliest profiles on him back in 2003. As she notes in today’s article:

I spent many months on his trail in 2002 for Vanity Fair and discovered not only that he was not who he claimed to be professionally, but also that he had allegedly assaulted two young sisters, one of whom had been underage at the time. Very bravely, they were prepared to go on the record. They were afraid he’d use all his influence to discredit them—and their fear turned out to be legitimate.

As the article was being readied for publication, Epstein made a visit to the office of Vanity Fair’s then-editor, Graydon Carter, and suddenly the women and their allegations were removed from the article. “He’s sensitive about the young women,” Carter told me at the time. (Editor’s Note: Carter has previously denied this allegation.) He also mentioned he’d finagled a photograph of Epstein in a swimsuit out of the encounter. And there was also some feeble excuse about the article “being stronger as a business story.” (Epstein had also leaned heavily on my ex-husband’s uncle, Conrad Black, to try to exert his influence on me, which was particularly unwelcome, given that Black happened to be my ex-husband’s boss at the time.)

Many people had assumed Epstein was untouchable merely because he had so much dirt on so many powerful people, but it increasingly looks far bigger than that. It appears he may have been untouchable because he was systematically collecting this information on behalf of an intelligence agency. If so, we need to find out precisely who he was working for.

This should be the number one story in the country right now. Blackmail at this level is a genuine national security issue.




Michael Krieger@LibertyBlitz

· Jul 9, 2019




Replying to @LibertyBlitz
Wow.
Apparently Acosta claimed Epstein "belonged to intelligence" and was told to back off.
It's all making sense now.https://t.co/rXnZZwZCCC






Michael Krieger@LibertyBlitz


If we can somehow get to the bottom of Epstein I suspect we’ll learn a lot about how the world of the powerful really works, and why everything is so fked and corrupt.



297

10:58 AM - Jul 9, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy



126 people are talking about this



* * *

Liberty Blitzkrieg is now 100% ad free. As such, there’s no monetization for this site other than reader support. To make this a successful, sustainable thing I ask you to consider the following options. You can become a Patron. You can visit the Support Page to donate via PayPal, Bitcoin or send cash/check in the mail.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-10/bombshell-alex-acosta-reportedly-claimed-jeffrey-epstein-belonged-intelligence



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1148425)7/10/2019 3:24:14 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
rdkflorida2

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577024
 

Jeffrey Epstein’s fortune is built on fraud, a former mentor says

By Heather TimmonsJuly 9, 2019

How, exactly, did accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein propel himself from a middle-class boy in Brooklyn to a secretive, maybe-billionairewith multiple mansions and a private jet?

[ BTW it was Wm Barr's dad that put a 20 yo college drop out in charge of teaching high school kids. What was going on there? ]

While the financial world has been puzzling over the question for years, it is really not that complicated, according to Steven Jude Hoffenberg, Epstein’s former mentor. Epstein used fraudulently gotten funds as seed money, he told Quartz.

Epstein became known in financial circles in the early 2000s for managing money for Les Wexner, the billionaire head of Limited Inc. But as Vicky Ward wrote in an extensive 2003 profile of Epstein in Vanity Fair, he earlier worked for Hoffenberg. In the late 1980s, Hoffenberg “hired his new protégé as a consultant at $25,000 a month.” They traveled the world together on Hoffenberg’s plane, Ward wrote.

In 1997, Hoffenberg—the head of bill-collection firm Towers Financial—was sentenced to 20 years in jail for running one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in US history.Thousands of investors were bilked of more than $450 million.

Hoffenberg now tells Quartz that Epstein was deeply involved in the fraud. Epstein was never charged in the case, but he was “totally in the mix,” Hoffenberg said. He added that Epstein helped him set up the Ponzi scheme.

“He was my colleague daily, seven days a week,” Hoffenberg added.


Hoffenberg said Epstein’s connection to the crime didn’t come up at the time because he pled guilty. “When you plead guilty you don’t go in for elaborate discovery.”

Hoffenberg was released from prison in late 2013 after serving almost 20 years in jail. He still hasn’t paid back most of the money he took from investors, a demand the judge included in his original sentence.

Epstein named in legal filings Hoffenberg’s allegations are also made in a lawsuit filed in August 2018 by former Towers investors. The suit calls Epstein an “uncharged co-conspirator.” It also alleges that the millions in stolen investment was the seed capital for Epstein’s hedge fund, which it values at $50 billion. The suit says Epstein “knowingly and intentionally utilized funds he fraudulently diverted and obtained from this massive Ponzi scheme for his own personal use to support a lavish lifestyle,” but does not elaborate.

Reid Weingarten, the attorney representing Epstein, didn’t respond to a request for comment on the various allegations made against Epstein.

One exhibit filed with the court by Hoffenberg and Towers noteholders says that Hoffenberg, Epstein and Towers Financial “operated a classic Ponzi scheme from the late 1980s to mid-1990s,” which succeeded in soliciting over $500 million dollars in investments from participants. All of the money was “misappropriated for improper and personal uses,” the exhibit claims, but does not provide any substantiating evidence.

Epstein “provided services including, but not limited to, assisting Mr. Hoffenberg full-time in all matters of business operations and management of TFC [Towers Financial], including, but not limited to, raising capital as a co-conspirator in connection with the TFC Ponzi Fraud,” the exhibit claims.

Together, Hoffenberg and Epstein sold $272 million of promissory notes through six private placements, based on “bogus income and asset figures to conceal TFC’s true financial condition.” The proceeds were “used to pay TFC’s operating expenses,” the filing claims. They did the same with five private placements of $210 million of bonds, based on bogus financial information.

In October of 2018, the lawsuit was withdrawn. Hoffenberg said the plaintiffs plan to refile it. A lawyer for the plaintiffs, however, said they had no knowledge of that plan. A 2013 filing byHoffenberg claims Epstein should pay restitution to Towers investors from his hedge fund. It was dismissed by a judge because the same law firm was representing Hoffenberg and Towers investors.

Hoffenberg added that in the 1990s, Epstein showed signs of the same predatory behavior toward girls that he was charged with on Monday (July 8).

Off the Trump team Hoffenberg, a former Trump Tower tenant, started the pro-Trump political action committee Get Our Jobs Back in April of 2016. He said in a FEC filing in June it would conduct a $50 million marketing campaign for Trump. He “left the Trump team” after being disillusioned with their campaign tactics, he told Quartz, and particularly their reliance on Wikileaks.

“I’m off the Trump team,” he said. “I told Roger Stone and all of them not to do the Wikileaks, and no one listens.”

He became a born-again Christian while he was in prison, he told Quartz, and spent years studying the Bible at his wife’s urging. Hoffenberg said he is speaking out now to help the original investors get their money back. The 1997 judgement against him requires him to pay investors back.

“I can’t support people who blatantly break the law. My moral compass today as a born again Christian is very substantial,” he said.

Justin Rohrlich contributed reporting.

qz.com