Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1149110)	7/12/2019 5:45:25 PM
From: Sdgla	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574006

Not really a bombshell imo. Just truth It was all about power & the sheep fell for it. Time to adjust to the truth: https://t.co/eGNxpXuFmV — Craig Sawyer 🇺🇸 (@CraigRSawyer) July 12, 2019

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1149110)	7/12/2019 5:55:33 PM
From: Bonefish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574006

Who took the citizenship question off the census? Year?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1149110)	7/12/2019 8:30:26 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574006

Wharfie, So why do you fear the most accurate count possible? You obviously weren't listening. The question itself isn't going to lead to an inaccurate count. It's the ARTIFICIAL fears over said question that will lead to an inaccurate count. And those fears are being stoked by the Democrats. Like I said, there's nothing in that question that should be feared by non-citizens, legal or otherwise. It doesn't even ask you if you're here legally. It only asks you if you're a citizen. Lots of non-citizens, especially green card holders, can answer that question truthfully and without any fear of prosecution. Tenchusatsu