Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1152826)	7/27/2019 10:49:47 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570516

>> The scientific view is most prominent. Have these "scientists" considered planting trees? That is by far the most sensible approach to dealing with the CO2 problem. It harmless, long-term in nature, and will go a very long way toward solving the problem if you do it in big numbers. Worldwide, there is as much land as that in the CONUS that is entirely practical for reforestation. If you want to plant trees, go for it. 40 years from now someone can cut them down and start over. It is as close as you can get to doing it nature's way.

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1152826)	7/28/2019 11:51:52 AM
From: RetiredNow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570516

Your statement is factually accurate. The vast majority of scientists do accept that as fact. I also accept that as a high probability, although I think modern climate science and models don't accurately take into account the effect of sun spots and cosmic rays that impact cloud formation and the greenhouse effect from that...those two things having more of an impact than CO2. I think too many people focus too much on CO2 to the exclusion of far more impactful things. But Brumar does not believe in climate change being caused by humans, which is why I asked him if he finds it problematic that Google is biased against his beliefs. We were discussing free speech. It is clear Google is pushing the climate change propaganda, because Google is biased to the left. I'm surprised that Brumar doesn't get upset that his views are not properly represented in the search results.