Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sdgla who wrote (1152839)	7/28/2019 1:07:29 AM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Recommended By Brumar89 Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577186

Conservative Wall Street Journal joins chorus of news organizations called Trump’s attacks ‘racist’ Published 14 mins ago on July 27, 2019 By Sarah K. Burris rawstory.com There was a time in America when calling a president’s comments “racist” was simply not done by news organizations. It was editorializing. But when it comes to President Donald Trump’s “go back” tweets and chants, even the conservative Wall Street Journal is calling a spade a spade. Noteworthy: @WSJ has joined @washingtonpost in calling Trump’s “go back” tweets simply “racist.” Not “allegedly.” Not “opponents say.” Just, these are racist. pic.twitter.com/N4NI5ow1xX — Jack Newsham (@TheNewsHam) July 28, 2019 “Several of Mr. Trump’s tweets feature or are based on Fox News segments,” a recent report in The Journal said. “In recent weeks, he has targeted a range of Democrats as well as the media and the Federal Reserve. He criticized the Democrat-led Congressional hearings earlier in the week featuring former Special Counsel Robert Mueller as the latest act in a ‘witch hunt,’ and he has sustained his criticism of the so-called “squad” of four progressive congresswomen after sending racist tweets about them two weeks ago.” CNN was the first news organization to call Trump’s tweets racist, with MSNBC following. The Washington Post also followed, even going so far as to point to Reuters for not knowing how to respond to it.