To: Dale Baker who wrote (431 ) 1/29/1998 4:56:00 PM From: jgideon Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 118717
Dale, about AWRE, which I mentioned in a previous post. The early news about the MSFT, INTC, CPQ grand alliance over ADSL involved AWRE because these 3 were using AWRE stuff in demonstrations to drum up support. The technology in Universal ADSL is not exclusive to AWRE as far as I can determine. Once the UAWG (see uawg.org ) made an announcement, everybody who could conceivably claim to be involved with ADSL came out with announcements of forthcoming products. Also see adsl.com AWRE seems to be early in getting a shippable product, but, unless the RBOCs move with uncharacteristic speed, it appears that everybody will be in production by the time real demand is there. One note: US West today announced deployment of ADSL service to about 40 areas by this summer. They are using the NetSpeed ADSL modem - I don't know if AWRE has a licensing agreement with them. (US West had previously been using Pairgain xDSL stuff in their Phoenix trial, don't know what changed) At least one RBOC is not acting like a lumbering giant. The kicker is the cost. $40/month buys you 256k speed, while 768k speed runs $80. Prices for 1, 4, & 7M download speeds were not released. Plus, I believe you still need an ISP for another $20/month. Back to topic: AWRE has several licensing agreements with big names like 3Com, ADI, Ericsson. They have a product to ship this quarter. But they don't have a unique niche. In fact it is getting more crowded every day. On the AWRE thread, there were some synopses of Tuesday's conference call, and perhaps Lucent has a deal with AWRE (only rumor). Can a small company find a place in a very competitive market? Having used @Home service at my sister's house (and been connected via T1's for years at work), I know that ADSL will be a desirable product. The cost, especially compared to @Home and other cable offerings, will be key. The market for this is definitely a growth one. AWRE just doesn't have a strong enough position to justify the 30-40% spike it got from the initial announcement. It is a short until it returns to the $11-11.50 range, IMHO. Another way to view it is as a possible takeover candidate for one of the big guys. Don't see that happening with the proliferation of DSL out there. Comments? jg