Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KM who wrote (44258)	1/21/1998 11:09:00 PM
From: kjude	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

solution. start a trading iom thread. it should be able to stand on its own. regards.

To: KM who wrote (44258)	1/21/1998 11:13:00 PM
From: John Alan Wallace	Respond to of 58324

<<< I find Gary's point of view and information not only highly relevant, but also some of the only useful information here. I resent attempts to shut him down or belittle his contributions.>>> Seems to me that nobody is trying to shut Gary down or slight his contributions, IMO many people are growing tired of Gary trying to shut other people down. Just my two cents worth. JW

To: KM who wrote (44258)	1/21/1998 11:18:00 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Trufflette, * OT * >I understand that there is a place for technical discussion here and that I can skip over it, but there is also a place for good trading information, and I want it to continue to be posted here.< Business, technical info, trading tips, rumors involving Iomega, all have a place here. The friction is due to some trying to control which issues are discussed on the thread. What's irrelevant to me may be relevant to you - as long as it is remotely connected to Iomega's business, or to how to make money through IOM stock. Nobody knows enough to restrict discussion only to "relevant" subjects. If anyone were that smart, he wouldn't need this thread. Any "irrelevant" point raised will die if nobody else is interested in replying. And that's as it should be. So what do you think the market will do if Clinton is impeached? <G> Regards GM

To: KM who wrote (44258)	1/21/1998 11:26:00 PM
From: Fred J. Ledo	Respond to of 58324

Trufflette, What are you talking about? I understand you come in defense of a victim named Gary UltraWisdom, but, you are off base. While I told GUW to shut up, it was because he continues to censor and direct this thread as sole owner. He indeed interrupted an informative dialogue, in after-hours, related to IOM. It is this "techno-geek" stuff that is producing sales that fuel this stock. Don't get so caught up in your tech analysis trading that you forget that the industry IOM is in is requires an understanding of technology. Fred

To: KM who wrote (44258)	1/21/1998 11:26:00 PM
From: slipnsip	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

<I understand that there is a place for technical discussion here and that I can skip over it, but there is also a place for good trading information, and I want it to continue to be posted here.> Going way out on a limb here considering the amount of respect you get from others here, but along with your numerous posts with good information, you bring alot of baggage posts. Some quite entertaining, but none the less no more useful than someone sharing their personal thoughts on an earnings "guess".