Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Taking Advantage of a Sharply Changing Environment -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doug R who wrote (2145)	8/4/2019 1:05:13 AM
From: teevee	2 Recommendations Recommended By Doug R Hawkmoon Respond to of 6365

Agreed. The AGW climate cabal will go to almost any lengths to discredit anyone whose research questions man made climate change and CO2 emissions as responsible for the change. I find it unbelievable they continue ot have such sway over peer review and publication. The dark age of climate change over science continues....

To: Doug R who wrote (2145)	8/5/2019 7:08:09 AM
From: maceng2	1 Recommendation Recommended By Hawkmoon Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6365

Isn't the paper based on the assumption that the Earth is rotating about the Solar Systems barycentre rather then the Sun Earth Barycenter (as it should be) ? Also the prediction in the paper say we will see global warming rather then a cooling effect from a solar minimum and a lowering of the magnetic shields, increase in cosmic ray index, more high level cloud cover, higher albedo and thus a cooling trend similar to the maunder minimum? I liked Zarhova's last paper that treated the Sun only and its mathematical prediction. This latest paper looks to be receiving a bad review, and it does not look to me to up to scratch. nature.com newscientist.com pubpeer.com This discussion is relevant tallbloke.wordpress.com